ArticleCureus2024
The Effect of Intra-abdominal Pressure on Heart Rate Variability and Hemodynamics During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic changes using heart rate variability (HRV) measurements in diabetic and nondiabetic patients who will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to provide our preoperative measurements to guide us for better perioperative anesthesia management. Materials and methods The study included 143 patients aged 40 years and older who would undergo elective laparoscopic surgery, did not have any comorbidities other than diabetes mellitus (DM) type II, and were in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III risk group. Patients were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 77) and the DM group (n = 66). The preoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level was measured. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and hemodynamic parameters such as systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and HRV parameters were measured preoperatively, perioperatively, and postoperatively. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was administered at 10-12 mmHg. Results Even though SAP, DAP, MAP, and HR decreased with induction, they increased with insufflation, and an overall decrease was seen at the postoperative 24th hour for all parameters. When the groups were evaluated, no difference was observed except that the DAP was significantly lower in the DM group (p = 0.029) at insufflation and the HR was higher in the DM group at induction, and the difference was significant (p = 0.001). Preoperative HRV parameters were significantly lower in the DM group. According to the HRV parameters, although a decrease was observed after induction and insufflation, conversely, an increase was observed postoperatively. When the postoperative and preoperative values were compared, the standard deviation of the NN (R-R) intervals (SDNN), SDNN index, high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), and LF/HF parameters were found to be significantly lower in the DM group than in the control group. Conclusion Diabetic patients are more sensitive to increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in laparoscopic surgery, and the effects on cardiac autonomic functions can be determined by HRV measurements without clinically reflecting on hemodynamic data. Additionally, in diabetic patients with preoperative LF and/or HF values less than 100, we believe that careful follow-up in terms of autonomic neuropathy complications and anesthesia management should be done more meticulously in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.