ArticleCureus2024
Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Attention and Brain Activity in Healthy Participants Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: An Interventional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Involuntary limb activation using functional electrical stimulation (FES) can improve unilateral spatial neglect. However, the impact of FES on brain activity related to spatial attention remains unclear. Thus, in this study, we aimed to examine the effects of FES on spatial attention. Methodology In this interventional study, 13 healthy right-handed participants were asked to perform the Posner task for six minutes both before and after either FES or sham stimulation during each set, resulting in a total of two sets. FES was applied to the left forearm extensor muscles, with a frequency of 25 Hz, a pulse width of 100 μs, and the intensity adjusted to reach the motor threshold. Both the energization and pause times were set to five seconds. The Posner task was used to measure reaction time to a target appearing on a computer screen. Brain activity, indicated by oxygenated hemoglobin values, was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy with 24 probes according to the International 10-20 system method. Results In the left hemisphere, oxygenated hemoglobin values in the premotor and supplementary motor areas, primary somatosensory cortex, and somatosensory association areas were significantly higher after FES than after sham stimulation. In the right hemisphere, oxygenated hemoglobin values were significantly increased in the premotor, primary, and supplementary motor areas; in the supramarginal gyrus; and in the somatosensory association areas after FES. Reaction times in the Posner task did not differ significantly between the FES and sham conditions. Conclusions Collectively, these results suggest that FES of the upper limbs can activate the ventral pathway of the visual attention network and improve stimulus-driven attention. Activation of stimulus-driven attentional function could potentially contribute to symptom improvement in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.