Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725688›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Integrating systemic immune-inflammation index, fibrinogen, and T-SPOT.TB for precision distinction of active pulmonary tuberculosis in the era of mycobacterial disease research.

Zhikang Yu, Zifang Shang, Qingyan Huang, Feiqiu Wen, Sandip Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhikang YuResearch Experiment Center, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China.
Zifang ShangResearch Experiment Center, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China.
Qingyan HuangResearch Experiment Center, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China.
Feiqiu WenDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Sandip PatilDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical challenge of differentiating suspected tuberculosis with positive T-SPOT.TB results persist. This study aims to investigate the utility of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Fibrinogen, and T-SPOT.TB in distinguishing between active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and non-tuberculous lung diseases. Methods: A retrospective analysis included 1,327 cases of active PTB with positive T-SPOT.TB results and 703 cases of non-tuberculous lung diseases from May 2016 to December 2020 at Meizhou People's Hospital. These were designated as the case group and the control group, respectively. The detection indicators of T-SPOT.TB: Early Secreted Antigenic Target 6 (ESAT-6), Culture Filtrate Protein 10 (CFP-10), as well as SII and Fibrinogen levels-were compared and analyzed for association and joint diagnostic value between the two groups. Results: The case group showed higher values of ESAT-6, CFP-10, SII, and Fibrinogen compared to the control group (all Conclusion: SII and Fibrinogen are positively correlated with the degree of tuberculosis inflammation and the bacterial load of

Indexed as

fibrinogenpulmonary disease differentiationsystemic immune-inflammation index (SII)T-SPOT.TBtuberculosis diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID38725688
PMCPMC11079184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.