Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725634›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Pain management in cervical cancer.

Sebastián Aguiar-Rosas, Ricardo Plancarte-Sanchez, B Carolina Hernandez-Porras, Jorge García-Andreu, Brenda Olivia Lezcano-Velazquez, Ignacio Reyes-Torres, Silvia Alarcón-Barrios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pain management and analgesic strategies in patients with carcinoma uterine cervix undergoing intracavitary or interstitial brachytherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sebastián Aguiar-RosasPain Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ricardo Plancarte-SanchezPain Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
B Carolina Hernandez-PorrasPain Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge García-AndreuStar Medica Hospital, Queretaro, Mexico.
Brenda Olivia Lezcano-VelazquezPain Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ignacio Reyes-TorresIndependent Researcher, Saltillo, Mexico.
Silvia Alarcón-BarriosPain Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) occupies the second place in incidence and mortality among women in México. Despite this, Cervical Cancer continues to have a late diagnosis which leads to a high rate of complications. Pain represents the most feared and disabling symptom, being present in up to 86% of patients with advanced disease. The approach to managing pain in this population has not been studied and described to a full extent. In addition, there is a pressing need to provide concise recommendations to promote adequate pain control. We performed a review of the literature in CC and had experts in the field of pain management evaluate the evidence found. We then issued relevant recommendations on pharmacology and interventional pain management. Thus, the approach to pain management must be comprehensive and individualized, considering the timely and appropriate use of pharmacologic treatment as well as interventional procedures.

Indexed as

cancer paincervix cancerinterventional painopioidspaintreatmentuterine cervix cancer

Identifiers

PMID38725634
PMCPMC11079655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.