Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Development and external validation of a transfer learning-based system for the pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a large emulated prospective study.

Liuhong Yuan, Henghua Zhou, Xiao Xiao, Xiuqin Zhang, Feier Chen, Lin Liu, Jingjia Liu, Shisan Bao, Kun Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liuhong Yuan *Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Henghua Zhou *Department of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao Xiao *Wision Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Xiuqin ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Feier ChenDepartment of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Lin LiuInstitute of Natural Sciences, MOE-LSC, School of Mathematical Sciences, CMA-Shanghai, SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jingjia LiuWision Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Shisan BaoDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Kun TaoDepartment of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The progress in Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and management has resulted in an unprecedented caseload for histopathological diagnosis. While artificial intelligence (AI) presents a potential solution, the predominant emphasis on slide-level aggregation performance without thorough verification of cancer in each location, impedes both explainability and transparency. Effectively addressing these challenges is crucial to ensuring the reliability and efficacy of AI in histology applications. Method: In this study, we created an innovative AI algorithm using transfer learning from a polyp segmentation model in endoscopy. The algorithm precisely localized CRC targets within 0.25 mm² grids from whole slide imaging (WSI). We assessed the CRC detection capabilities at this fine granularity and examined the influence of AI on the diagnostic behavior of pathologists. The evaluation utilized an extensive dataset comprising 858 consecutive patient cases with 1418 WSIs obtained from an external center. Results: Our results underscore a notable sensitivity of 90.25% and specificity of 96.60% at the grid level, accompanied by a commendable area under the curve (AUC) of 0.962. This translates to an impressive 99.39% sensitivity at the slide level, coupled with a negative likelihood ratio of <0.01, signifying the dependability of the AI system to preclude diagnostic considerations. The positive likelihood ratio of 26.54, surpassing 10 at the grid level, underscores the imperative for meticulous scrutiny of any AI-generated highlights. Consequently, all four participating pathologists demonstrated statistically significant diagnostic improvements with AI assistance. Conclusion: Our transfer learning approach has successfully yielded an algorithm that can be validated for CRC histological localizations in whole slide imaging. The outcome advocates for the integration of the AI system into histopathological diagnosis, serving either as a diagnostic exclusion application or a computer-aided detection (CADe) tool. This integration has the potential to alleviate the workload of pathologists and ultimately benefit patients.

Indexed as

AI-assisted pathological diagnosisartificial intelligence (AI)CRC (colorectal cancer)pathological diagnosistransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38725622
PMCPMC11079287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.