ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Prognostic analysis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of Node-RADS scoring in stage IIICr cervical cancer: development and validation of novel nomograms.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- The Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Exhibits A Superior Prognostic Value in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Coronary Syndrome.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stage IIIC1p cervical cancer is characterized by marked heterogeneity and considerable variability in the postoperative prognosis. This study aimed to identify the clinical and pathological characteristics affecting the survival of patients diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection between March 2012 and March 2022. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors for OS and forest plots were used to visualize these findings. Nomogram charts were created to forecast survival rates at 3 and 5 years, and the accuracy of predictions was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. Results: The study cohort comprised 186 women diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. The median follow-up duration was 51.1 months (range, 30-91 months), and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 71.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT + AC), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), ratio of lymph node metastasis (LNM), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) levels independently predicted OS. Conclusions: Significant prognostic disparities exist among patients diagnosed with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. MLR, ratio of LNM, and SCCA were associated with poor OS. In contrast, the CCRT + AC treatment regimen appeared to confer a survival advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.