Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725619›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Treatment with (chemo)-radiation in old patients (≥76 years of age) with newly diagnosed non-metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck region: real-world data from a tertiary referral center.

Leah-Sophie Winkler, Marlen Haderlein, Sabine Semrau, Florian Putz, Daniel Höfler, Sarina K Müller, Heinrich Iro, Marco Kesting, Rainer Fietkau, Philipp Schubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leah-Sophie Winkler *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Marlen Haderlein *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine SemrauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Florian PutzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Daniel HöflerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Sarina K MüllerComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Heinrich IroComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Marco KestingComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp SchubertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment of patients with cancer of the head and neck region is in focus in a multitude of studies. Of these patients, one patient group, those aged 76 and more, is mostly underrepresented despite requiring thorough and well-reasoned treatment decisions to offer curative treatment. This study investigates real-world data on curative treatment of old (≥76 years) patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region (HNSCC). Patients and methods: Between January 2010 and December 2021, we identified 71 patients older than 76 years with newly diagnosed HNSCC and cM0 at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Hospital of Erlangen-Nuremberg. Using electronic medical records, we analyzed treatment patterns and outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rate. Additionally, we performed univariate risk analysis and Cox regression in order to identify predictive factors associated with the abovementioned treatment outcomes. Results: The median follow-up was 18 months. OS was 83%, 79%, and 72% after 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. PFS was 69%, 54%, and 46% after 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. A total of 34 (48%) patients were treated with standard therapy according to current guidelines. The reasons for deviation from standard therapy before or during treatment were as follows: unfitness for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 37), reduction of chemotherapy (n = 3), and dose reduction/interruption of radiotherapy (n = 8). Carboplatin-based systemic therapy showed improved PFS compared to cisplatin or cetuximab (60 Conclusions: Adherence to treatment protocols for radiotherapy alone in old patients with HNSCC is good, whereas the application of concurrent chemotherapy often deviates from guidelines in terms of de-escalation. An important risk factor for decreased OS, PFS, and a higher rate of LRR appears to be non-oropharyngeal tumor location in old patients.

Indexed as

chemoradiationhead and neck cancerold patientssquamous cell carcinomatumor localization

Identifiers

PMID38725619
PMCPMC11079188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.