Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725545›Full record

ReviewCurrent clinical microbiology reports2024

Emerging Antifungal Resistance in Fungal Pathogens.

Sui Ting Hui, Hugh Gifford, Johanna Rhodes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current clinical microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Trichophyton indotineae: Epidemiology, antifungal resistance and antifungal stewardship strategies.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Review
  20. Detection of TR34/L98H pan-azole-resistantFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sui Ting HuiMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hugh GiffordMRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Johanna RhodesMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Over recent decades, the number of outbreaks caused by fungi has increased for humans, plants (including important crop species) and animals. Yet this problem is compounded by emerging antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic species. Resistance develops over time when fungi are exposed to drugs either in the patient or in the environment. Recent Findings: Novel resistant variants of fungal pathogens that were previously susceptible are evolving (such as Summary: This review highlights the important topic of emerging antifungal resistance in fungal pathogens and how it evolved, as well as how this relates to a growing public health burden.

Indexed as

Antifungal drug resistanceAspergillus fumigatusCandida aurisOne HealthPublic healthTrichophyton indotineae

Identifiers

PMID38725545
PMCPMC11076205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.