ArticlePNAS nexus2024
Predicting capillary vessel network hemodynamics in silico by machine learning.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood velocity and red blood cell (RBC) distribution profiles in a capillary vessel cross-section in the microcirculation are generally complex and do not follow Poiseuille's parabolic or uniform pattern. Existing imaging techniques used to map large microvascular networks in vivo do not allow a direct measurement of full 3D velocity and RBC concentration profiles, although such information is needed for accurate evaluation of the physiological variables, such as the wall shear stress (WSS) and near-wall cell-free layer (CFL), that play critical roles in blood flow regulation, disease progression, angiogenesis, and hemostasis. Theoretical network flow models, often used for hemodynamic predictions in experimentally acquired images of the microvascular network, cannot provide the full 3D profiles either. In contrast, such information can be readily obtained from high-fidelity computational models that treat blood as a suspension of deformable RBCs. These models, however, are computationally expensive and not feasible for extension to the microvascular network at large spatial scales up to an organ level. To overcome such limitations, here we present machine learning (ML) models that bypass such expensive computations but provide highly accurate and full 3D profiles of the blood velocity, RBC concentration, WSS, and CFL in every vessel in the microvascular network. The ML models, which are based on artificial neural networks and convolution-based U-net models, predict hemodynamic quantities that compare very well against the true data but reduce the prediction time by several orders. This study therefore paves the way for ML to make detailed and accurate hemodynamic predictions in spatially large microvascular networks at an organ-scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.