Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725518›Full record

ArticleChemical science2024

Obtaining giant Rashba-Dresselhaus spin splitting in two-dimensional chiral metal-organic frameworks.

Shanshan Liu, Ke Xu, Xingxing Li, Qunxiang Li, Jinlong Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shanshan LiuKey Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China lixx@ustc.edu.cn.
Ke XuHubei Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang 441053 China xuke@hbuas.edu.cn.
Xingxing LiKey Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China lixx@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7820-0772
Qunxiang LiKey Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China lixx@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-4454
Jinlong YangKey Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China lixx@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-5340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) nonmagnetic semiconductors with large Rashba-Dresselhaus (R-D) spin splitting at valence or conduction bands are attractive for magnetic-field-free spintronic applications. However, so far, the number of 2D R-D inorganic semiconductors has been quite limited, and the factors that determine R-D spin splitting as well as rational design of giant spin splitting, remain unclear. For this purpose, by exploiting 2D chiral metal-organic frameworks (CMOFs) as a platform, we theoretically develop a three-step screening method to obtain a series of candidate 2D R-D semiconductors with valence band spin splitting up to 97.2 meV and corresponding R-D coupling constants up to 1.37 eV Å. Interestingly, the valence band spin texture is reversible by flipping the chirality of CMOFs. Furthermore, five keys for obtaining giant R-D spin splitting in 2D CMOFs are successfully identified: (i) chirality, (ii) large spin-orbit coupling, (iii) narrow band gap, (iv) valence and conduction bands having the same symmetry at the

Identifiers

PMID38725518
PMCPMC11077538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.