ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2024
Deep learning to assess bone quality from panoramic radiographs: the feasibility of clinical application through comparison with an implant surgeon and cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiographic diagnosis of periodontitis using artificial intelligence: a meta-analysis comparing binary and staging classifications across imaging modalities.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- AI-enhanced routine CT for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and risk assessment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- CBCT Assessment for Dental Implant Surgery at the Maxilla: A Clinical Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Performance of artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and classification of peri-implantitis compared with periodontal surgeon assessment: a pilot study of panoramic radiograph analysis.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- Evaluating the quality and empathy of responses to patient questions on the Korean Academy of Periodontology's online question and answer section: a cross-sectional study comparing periodontists and an AI-powered chatbot.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- A Comparison of Deep Learning vs. Dental Implantologists in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Bone Quality Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- The Utility of Radiomorphometric Mandibular Indices on Cone Beam Computer Tomography in the Assessment of Bone Mass in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Early Marginal Bone Loss as a Determinant Factor of the Prognosis Rate of Dental Implants: A Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBone quality is one of the most important clinical factors for the primary stability and successful osseointegration of dental implants. This preliminary pilot study aimed to evaluate the clinical applicability of deep learning (DL) for assessing bone quality using panoramic (PA) radiographs compared with an implant surgeon's subjective tactile sense and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) values.
methodsIn total, PA images of 2,270 edentulous sites for implant placement were selected, and the corresponding CBCT relative gray value measurements and bone quality classification were performed using 3-dimensional dental image analysis software. Based on the pre-trained and fine-tuned ResNet-50 architecture, the bone quality classification of PA images was classified into 4 levels, from D1 to D4, and Spearman correlation analyses were performed with the implant surgeon's tactile sense and CBCT values.
resultsThe classification accuracy of DL was evaluated using a test dataset comprising 454 cropped PA images, and it achieved an area under the receiving characteristic curve of 0.762 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.714-0.810). Spearman correlation analysis of bone quality showed significant positive correlations with the CBCT classification (
conclusionsDL classification using PA images showed a significant and consistent correlation with CBCT classification and the surgeon's tactile sense in classifying the bone quality at the implant placement site. Further research based on high-quality quantitative datasets is essential to increase the reliability and validity of this method for actual clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.