ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2024
An 18F-FDG-PET/CT-based radiomics signature for estimating malignance probability of solitary pulmonary nodule.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence and risk factors for malignancy in patients with incidental solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of radiomics handcrafted features and deep features inBMC cancer · 2026Article
- [Glycolytic Reprogramming in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Metabolic Biomarkers and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Non-targeted metabolomics reveals diagnostic biomarker in the plasma of patients with lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- PET radiomics in lung cancer: advances and translational challenges.EJNMMI physics · 2024Review
- An 18F-FDG-PET/CT-based radiomics signature for estimating malignance probability of solitary pulmonary nodule.The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Article
- PET/CT radiomics and deep learning in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: progress and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) as early manifestations of lung cancer, it is difficult to determine its nature, which brings great trouble to clinical diagnosis and treatment. Radiomics can deeply explore the essence of images and provide clinical decision support for clinicians. The purpose of our study was to explore the effect of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-d-glucose integrated with computed tomography (CT;
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 190 patients with SPNs confirmed by pathology from January 2013 to December 2019 in our hospital. SPNs were benign in 69 patients and malignant in 121 patients. Patients were randomly divided into a training or testing group at a ratio of 7:3. Three-dimensional regions of interest (ROIs) were manually outlined on PET and CT images, and radiomics features were extracted. Synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) method was used to balance benign and malignant samples to a ratio of 1:1. In the training group, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses and Spearman correlation analyses were used to select the strongest radiomics features. Three models including PET model, CT model, and joint model were constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were plotted to evaluate diagnostic efficiency, calibration degree, and clinical usefulness of all models in training and testing groups.
resultsThe estimative effectiveness of the joint model was superior to the CT or PET model alone in the training and testing groups. For the joint model, CT model, and PET model, area under the ROC curve was 0.929, 0.819, 0.833 in the training group, and 0.844, 0.759, 0.748 in the testing group, respectively. Calibration and decision curves showed good fit and clinical usefulness for the joint model in both training and testing groups.
conclusionRadiomics models constructed by combining PET and CT radiomics features are valuable for distinguishing benign and malignant SPNs. The combined effect is superior to qualitative diagnoses with CT or PET radiomics models alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.