Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725299›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2024

Ambient fine particulate matter and daily mortality: a comparative analysis of observed and estimated exposure in 347 cities.

Wenhua Yu, Wenzhong Huang, Antonio Gasparrini, Francesco Sera, Alexandra Schneider, Susanne Breitner, Jan Kyselý, Joel Schwartz, Joana Madureira, Vânia Gaio and 12 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wenhua YuClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-8610
Wenzhong HuangClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Antonio GasparriniDepartment of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-3568
Francesco SeraDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications 'G. Parenti', University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-6848
Alexandra SchneiderInstitute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Susanne BreitnerInstitute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Jan KyselýDepartment of Climatology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Joel SchwartzDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Joana MadureiraDepartment of Environmental Health, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr Ricardo Jorge, Porto, Portugal.
Vânia GaioDepartment of Epidemiology, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr Ricardo Jorge, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-4991
Yue Leon GuoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU) College of Medicine and NTU Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Rongbin XuClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1906-8614
Gongbo ChenClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Zhengyu YangClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Bo WenClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Yao WuClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Antonella ZanobettiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Haidong KanDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1871-8999
Jiangning SongMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8031-9086
Shanshan LiClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Yuming GuoClimate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Multi-City Multi-Country Collaborative Research Network

Funding

Australian Medical Research Future Fund 2015916Australian Research Council DP210102076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModel-estimated air pollution exposure products have been widely used in epidemiological studies to assess the health risks of particulate matter with diameters of ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5). However, few studies have assessed the disparities in health effects between model-estimated and station-observed PM2.5 exposures.

methodsWe collected daily all-cause, respiratory and cardiovascular mortality data in 347 cities across 15 countries and regions worldwide based on the Multi-City Multi-Country collaborative research network. The station-observed PM2.5 data were obtained from official monitoring stations. The model-estimated global PM2.5 product was developed using a machine-learning approach. The associations between daily exposure to PM2.5 and mortality were evaluated using a two-stage analytical approach.

resultsWe included 15.8 million all-cause, 1.5 million respiratory and 4.5 million cardiovascular deaths from 2000 to 2018. Short-term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with a relative risk increase (RRI) of mortality from both station-observed and model-estimated exposures. Every 10-μg/m3 increase in the 2-day moving average PM2.5 was associated with overall RRIs of 0.67% (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.85), 0.68% (95% CI: -0.03 to 1.39) and 0.45% (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.82) for all-cause, respiratory, and cardiovascular mortality based on station-observed PM2.5 and RRIs of 0.87% (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.06), 0.81% (95% CI: 0.08 to 1.55) and 0.71% (95% CI: 0.32 to 1.09) based on model-estimated exposure, respectively.

conclusionsMortality risks associated with daily PM2.5 exposure were consistent for both station-observed and model-estimated exposures, suggesting the reliability and potential applicability of the global PM2.5 product in epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCardiovascular DiseasesCitiesEnvironmental ExposureParticulate MatterAdultAgedEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRespiratory Tract DiseasesAir PollutantsParticulate Matterair monitoring station observationfine particulate mattermodel estimationmortality risk comparisonShort-term exposure

Identifiers

PMID38725299
PMCPMC11082424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.