ArticlePlant communications2024
Diverse nucleotide substitutions in rice base editing mediated by novel TadA variants.
Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of dual base editors based on ssDNA-targeting SCP1.201 deaminases for the artificial evolution of novel herbicide-tolerant OsEPSPS variants.Plant communications · 2026Article
- De-extinction: how reviving the past is revolutionizing the future of conservation biology.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Rationally Designed TadA-Derived Cytosine Editors Enable Context-Independent Zebrafish Genome Editing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Engineering Adenine Deaminase TadA for Precise and PAM-Flexible Point Mutagenesis and Gradient-Tuning Endogenous Protein Design.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Developing glycosylase-based T-to-G and C-to-K base editors in rice.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Advancements of CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing in Crops and Potential Applications inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-mediated base editors have been widely used to correct defective alleles and create novel alleles by artificial evolution for the rapid genetic improvement of crops. The editing capabilities of base editors strictly rely on the performance of various nucleotide modification enzymes. Compared with the well-developed adenine base editors (ABEs), cytosine base editors (CBEs) and dual base editors suffer from unstable editing efficiency and patterns at different genomic loci in rice, significantly limiting their application. Here, we comprehensively examined the base editing activities of multiple evolved TadA8e variants in rice. We found that both TadA-CDd and TadA-E27R/N46L achieved more robust C-to-T editing than previously reported hyperactive hAID∗Δ, and TadA-CDd outperformed TadA-E27R/N46L. A C-to-G base editor (CGBE) engineered with TadA-CDd and OsUNG performed highly efficient C-to-G editing in rice compared with that of TadA-N46P. In addition, a dual base editor constructed with a single protein, TadDE, enabled simultaneous, highly efficient C-to-T and A-to-G editing in rice. Collectively, our results demonstrate that TadA8e derivatives improve both CBEs and dual base editors in rice, providing a powerful way to induce diverse nucleotide substitutions for plant genome editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.