ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024
Effect of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection on IVF outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: the PROVA randomized controlled trial.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ovarian Rejuvenation Through Intra-ovarian Injection of Platelet Rich Plasma for Women With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) and Poor Ovarian Response (POR)
Biological and Proteomic Characterisation of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Before and After Mobilisation of Haematopoietic Stem Cells in Peripheral Blood From Women With Low Ovarian Response (Low Responders) and in Vitro Evaluation in Human Ovarian Cell Models
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Platelet-rich plasma and folliculogenesis: a systematic mechanistic review and computational pathway analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of intraovarian autologous platelet-rich plasma in women with poor ovarian reserve or ovarian insufficiency: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma for enhanced ovarian function and reproductive success in women with POI and POR: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Intra-ovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma in patients with poor ovarian response; a randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of single and double platelet-rich plasma treatment for diminished ovarian reserve.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Trial
- Ovarian ageing: from biological constraint to emerging therapeutic frontier.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Bilateral ovarian abscesses following platelet-rich plasma injection for "ovarian rejuvenation": a case report.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Platelet-rich plasma for ovarian "rejuvenation": evidence lagging, safety missing.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Intraovarian Platelet-Rich Plasma for Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma combined with peripheral blood mononuclear cells improves ovarian function in advanced-age women with diminished ovarian reserve: a clinical retrospective cohort and single-cell transcriptomic analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Platelet-rich plasma in reproductive medicine: from ovarian follicles to the ovarian niche and emerging stem cell mobilization-based regenerative strategies.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Research trends on platelet-rich plasma in improving ovarian dysfunction: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Premature Ovarian Insufficiency and Diminished Ovarian Reserve: From Diagnosis to Current Management and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infusion appeared to benefit low prognosis IVF patients; however, when compared to controls, no significant benefit could be confirmed.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Efficacy of intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma on outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response: A systematic review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025Review
- Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection for ovarian rejuvenation.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Add-On Technologies That Aim to Improve Oocyte Quality and Embryo Implantation Potential.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Article
- Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection significantly improves blastocyst yield and quality in IVF patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma modulates endometrial immune status and improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with persistent chronic endometritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDoes intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection increase the number of mature oocytes obtained after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in young women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield after COS in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: POR is frequently encountered among the infertile population and the number of women seeking infertility treatment related to POR is increasing. Effective treatment options for this patient population to conceive with autologous oocytes are lacking. Case series and cohort studies suggest that intraovarian PRP injection may improve follicular recruitment in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and POR, yet robust randomized studies have not been performed to date to determine the clinical utility of this intervention. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at university-affiliated reproductive centers in the USA and Turkey, between January 2020 and November 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsPatients who met inclusion criteria (<38 years old, two or more prior cycles with <3 oocytes retrieved; and without single gene disorders, prior ovarian surgery, endometriomas, BMI >35 kg/m2, or severe male factor infertility) were randomized to either the PRP or control group. Patients in both groups subsequently underwent COS, oocyte retrieval, ICSI, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and single euploid embryo transfer. Number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count [AFC] and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]), blastocyst and euploid blastocyst yields, and sustained implantation. The study was powered to detect a difference of one mature oocyte obtained at oocyte retrieval. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 83 patients met inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive autologous intraovarian PRP injection (n = 41) or to no intervention (n = 42). No significant differences were observed in number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle (2.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.1 ± 3.3 in PRP vs control, respectively; P = 0.9), blastocysts (1.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.8), or euploid blastocysts (0.8 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.6; P = 0.5). Similarly, no differences were observed in the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst (45% vs 37%, P = 0.4; relative risk [RR], 95% CI = 0.9, 0.6-1.2) or the rate of sustained implantation (31% vs 29%, P = 0.9; RR 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Posttreatment AFC (7.9 ± 4.5 vs 6.8 ± 4.8, P = 0.3) and AMH (0.99 ± 0.98 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.2) were also not different between the groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Results from this RCT may not be generalizable to other PRP preparations owing to heterogeneity and lack of standardization. The control groups did not undergo a sham ovarian injection, which would have been relevant had the results shown benefit of PRP injection. Only patients with POR were included in this study, and these results may not be generalizable to more severe diminution of ovarian reserve, as seen with POI. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield or other parameters of IVF outcome in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. The results from this study do not support the use of intraovarian PRP injection in this population. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Departmental funds were used and no external funding was requested for this study. ES is a consultant for and receives grant funding from the Foundation for Embryonic Competence. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov Registry Identifier: NCT04163640. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 15 November 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 24 February 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38725194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.