ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Efficient pulse sequence design framework for high-dimensional MR fingerprinting scans using systematic error index.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFor effective optimization of MR fingerprinting (MRF) pulse sequences, estimating and minimizing errors from actual scan conditions are crucial. Although virtual-scan simulations offer an approximation to these errors, their computational demands become expensive for high-dimensional MRF frameworks, where interactions between more than two tissue properties are considered. This complexity makes sequence optimization impractical. We introduce a new mathematical model, the systematic error index (SEI), to address the scalability challenges for high-dimensional MRF sequence design.
methodsBy eliminating the need to perform dictionary matching, the SEI model approximates quantification errors with low computational costs. The SEI model was validated in comparison with virtual-scan simulations. The SEI model was further applied to optimize three high-dimensional MRF sequences that quantify two to four tissue properties. The optimized scans were examined in simulations and healthy subjects.
resultsThe proposed SEI model closely approximated the virtual-scan simulation outcomes while achieving hundred- to thousand-times acceleration in the computational speed. In both simulation and in vivo experiments, the optimized MRF sequences yield higher measurement accuracy with fewer undersampling artifacts at shorter scan times than the heuristically designed sequences.
conclusionWe developed an efficient method for estimating real-world errors in MRF scans with high computational efficiency. Our results illustrate that the SEI model could approximate errors both qualitatively and quantitatively. We also proved the practicality of the SEI model of optimizing sequences for high-dimensional MRF frameworks with manageable computational power. The optimized high-dimensional MRF scans exhibited enhanced robustness against undersampling and system imperfections with faster scan times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.