Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725065›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Exploration of a machine learning approach for diagnosing sarcopenia among Chinese community-dwelling older adults using sEMG-based data.

Na Li, Jiarui Ou, Haoru He, Jiayuan He, Le Zhang, Zhengchun Peng, Junwen Zhong, Ning Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Na LiThe National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jiarui OuCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Haoru HeThe National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jiayuan HeThe National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Le ZhangCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Zhengchun PengSchool of Electronic Information and ElectricaEngineering, Shanghaijiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Junwen ZhongDepartment of Electromechanical Engineering and Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, University of Macau, Macau, SAR, 999078, China.
Ning JiangThe National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. jiangning21@wchscu.cn.

Funding

A 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence from West China Hospital ZYYC22001NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-04137-2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the practical application of sarcopenia screening, there is a need for faster, time-saving, and community-friendly detection methods. The primary purpose of this study was to perform sarcopenia screening in community-dwelling older adults and investigate whether surface electromyogram (sEMG) from hand grip could potentially be used to detect sarcopenia using machine learning (ML) methods with reasonable features extracted from sEMG signals. The secondary aim was to provide the interpretability of the obtained ML models using a novel feature importance estimation method.

methodsA total of 158 community-dwelling older residents (≥ 60 years old) were recruited. After screening through the diagnostic criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019 (AWGS 2019) and data quality check, participants were assigned to the healthy group (n = 45) and the sarcopenic group (n = 48). sEMG signals from six forearm muscles were recorded during the hand grip task at 20% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and 50% MVC. After filtering recorded signals, nine representative features were extracted, including six time-domain features plus three time-frequency domain features. Then, a voting classifier ensembled by a support vector machine (SVM), a random forest (RF), and a gradient boosting machine (GBM) was implemented to classify healthy versus sarcopenic participants. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was utilized to investigate feature importance during classification.

resultsSeven out of the nine features exhibited statistically significant differences between healthy and sarcopenic participants in both 20% and 50% MVC tests. Using these features, the voting classifier achieved 80% sensitivity and 73% accuracy through a five-fold cross-validation. Such performance was better than each of the SVM, RF, and GBM models alone. Lastly, SHAP results revealed that the wavelength (WL) and the kurtosis of continuous wavelet transform coefficients (CWT_kurtosis) had the highest feature impact scores.

conclusionThis study proposed a method for community-based sarcopenia screening using sEMG signals of forearm muscles. Using a voting classifier with nine representative features, the accuracy exceeds 70% and the sensitivity exceeds 75%, indicating moderate classification performance. Interpretable results obtained from the SHAP model suggest that motor unit (MU) activation mode may be a key factor affecting sarcopenia.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyHand StrengthIndependent LivingMachine LearningSarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalSupport Vector MachineEarly diagnosisEMGMachine learningSarcopeniaSHAP

Identifiers

PMID38725065
PMCPMC11080130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.