Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725060›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024

Past, present, and future of sustainable intensive care: narrative review and a large hospital system experience.

Faisal N Masud, Farzan Sasangohar, Iqbal Ratnani, Sahar Fatima, Marco Antonio Hernandez, Teal Riley, Jason Fischer, Atiya Dhala, Megan E Gooch, Konya Keeling-Johnson and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Choosing Wisely Canada climate-conscious recommendations for critical care medicine.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  4. Environmental sustainability evidence in critical care medicine: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. [S1 guideline on sustainability in intensive care and emergency medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Summary of the S1 guideline on sustainability in intensive care and emergency medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Faisal N MasudCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA. fmasud@houstonmethodist.org.
Farzan SasangoharCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Iqbal RatnaniCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Sahar FatimaCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Marco Antonio HernandezCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Teal RileyCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jason FischerOffice of Sustainability, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Atiya DhalaDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Megan E GoochCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Konya Keeling-JohnsonCenter for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jukrin MoonCenter for Health Data Science and Analytics, Houston Methodist, 6550 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jean-Louis VincentErasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems are large contributors to global emissions, and intensive care units (ICUs) are a complex and resource-intensive component of these systems. Recent global movements in sustainability initiatives, led mostly by Europe and Oceania, have tried to mitigate ICUs' notable environmental impact with varying success. However, there exists a significant gap in the U.S. knowledge and published literature related to sustainability in the ICU. After a narrative review of the literature and related industry standards, we share our experience with a Green ICU initiative at a large hospital system in Texas. Our process has led to a 3-step pathway to inform similar initiatives for sustainable (green) critical care. This pathway involves (1) establishing a baseline by quantifying the status quo carbon footprint of the affected ICU as well as the cumulative footprint of all the ICUs in the healthcare system; (2) forming alliances and partnerships to target each major source of these pollutants and implement specific intervention programs that reduce the ICU-related greenhouse gas emissions and solid waste; and (3) finally to implement a systemwide Green ICU which requires the creation of multiple parallel pathways that marshal the resources at the grass-roots level to engage the ICU staff and institutionalize a mindset that recognizes and respects the impact of ICU functions on our environment. It is expected that such a systems-based multi-stakeholder approach would pave the way for improved sustainability in critical care.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsCarbon FootprintCritical CareHospitalsHumansSustainable DevelopmentTexasCritical careEnvironmentalismEnvironmental policy

Identifiers

PMID38725060
PMCPMC11080308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.