Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724984›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Zoonotic infections in UK and Irish veterinary students: a cross-sectional survey.

Tamzin Furtado, Lois Kennedy, Gina Pinchbeck, John S P Tulloch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamzin FurtadoDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, CH64 7TE, UK.
Lois KennedySchool of Veterinary Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, CH64 7TE, UK.
Gina PinchbeckDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, CH64 7TE, UK.
John S P TullochDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, CH64 7TE, UK. jtulloch@liverpool.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZoonotic infections are a recognised risk for the veterinary community. Veterinary students are at risk, due to the range of activities they participate with on training coupled with their inexperience; yet the prevalence and severity of infections in veterinary students has been little studied. In this study, a survey explored zoonotic infections in UK and Irish veterinary students.

methodsA survey containing both open and closed questions, was distributed to undergraduate veterinary students at all veterinary schools in the UK and Republic of Ireland. Descriptive statistics, and univariable logistic regression were used to explore quantitative data; thematic analysis was used to explore qualitative data.

resultsThere were 467 responses, 31.5% (95% CI 27.3-35.9, n = 147) of those students reported having contracted at least one zoonotic infection during their studies. The most prevalent self-reported infections were cryptosporidiosis (15.2% of all respondents), dermatophytosis (5.6%), and other gastrointestinal infections assumed to be of zoonotic origin (4.5%). 7% of respondents reported having acquired a zoonosis within the last 12 months, 91% of these infections were acquired during farm placements. Thematic analysis (n = 34) showed that infection was an accepted risk, particularly on farm, and students were often reluctant to take time off their studies or placements as a result of infection. Reporting was very low, meaning universities would not have accurate figures on infection risk or particularly risky placement providers.

conclusionsBased on these survey results, veterinary students appear to be at increased risk of contracting zoonotic diseases, particularly on farm placements. Attitude and behaviour change at multiple levels is required to reduce the risk of infection to students and normalise reporting of illness.

Indexed as

ZoonosesAdolescentAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIrelandMalePrevalenceStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultVeterinaryWork-place infectionZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID38724984
PMCPMC11084047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.