ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
OMD Curation Toolkit: a workflow for in-house curation of public omics datasets.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor advances in sequencing technologies and the sharing of data and metadata in science have resulted in a wealth of publicly available datasets. However, working with and especially curating public omics datasets remains challenging despite these efforts. While a growing number of initiatives aim to re-use previous results, these present limitations that often lead to the need for further in-house curation and processing.
resultsHere, we present the Omics Dataset Curation Toolkit (OMD Curation Toolkit), a python3 package designed to accompany and guide the researcher during the curation process of metadata and fastq files of public omics datasets. This workflow provides a standardized framework with multiple capabilities (collection, control check, treatment and integration) to facilitate the arduous task of curating public sequencing data projects. While centered on the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), the majority of the provided tools are generic and can be used to curate datasets from different sources.
conclusionsThus, it offers valuable tools for the in-house curation previously needed to re-use public omics data. Due to its workflow structure and capabilities, it can be easily used and benefit investigators in developing novel omics meta-analyses based on sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.