Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724821›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Current axillary management of patients with early breast cancer and low-volume nodal disease undergoing primary surgery: results of a United Kingdom national practice survey.

K Fairhurst, S A McIntosh, R I Cutress, S Potter, Our Citable Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K FairhurstCentre for Surgical Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. katherine.fairhurst@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-4978
S A McIntoshPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-9611
R I CutressSomers Cancer Research Building, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1719-7255
S PotterCentre for Surgical Research, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-312X
Our Citable Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUK NICE guidelines recommend axillary node clearance (ANC) should be performed in all patients with biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer having primary surgery. There is, however, increasing evidence such extensive surgery may not always be necessary. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) may be an effective alternative in patients with low-volume nodal disease who are clinically node negative (cN0) but have abnormal nodes detected radiologically. This survey aimed to explore current management of this group to inform feasibility of a future trial.

methodsAn online survey was developed to explore current UK management of patients with low-volume axillary disease and attitudes to a future trial. The survey was distributed via breast surgery professional associations and social media from September to November 2022. One survey was completed per unit and simple descriptive statistics used to summarise the results.

results51 UK breast units completed the survey of whom 78.5% (n = 40) reported performing ANC for all patients with biopsy-proven axillary nodal disease having primary surgery. Only 15.7% of units currently performed TAD either routinely (n = 6, 11.8%) or selectively (n = 2, 3.9%). There was significant uncertainty (83.7%, n = 36/43) about the optimal surgical management of these patients. Two-thirds (n = 27/42) of units felt an RCT comparing TAD and ANC would be feasible.

conclusionsANC remains standard of care for patients with low-volume node-positive breast cancer having primary surgery in the UK, but considerable uncertainty exists regarding optimal management of this group. This survey suggests an RCT comparing the outcomes of TAD and ANC may be feasible.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMastectomyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAxillary node clearanceBreast cancerLow volume nodal diseaseTargeted axillary dissectionTrial feasibility

Identifiers

PMID38724821
PMCPMC11208217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.