SynthesisAnnals of nuclear medicine2024
The prognostic value of lymph node to primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Post-neoadjuvant Metabolic Response Assessed by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Predicts Pathologic Complete Response and Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with the CROSS Regimen.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Association of lymph node ratio with adjuvant radiotherapy benefit in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Article
- Pretreatment nodal SUVmax predicts neck progression in hypopharyngeal cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy, while higher radiotherapy dose improves regional control particularly in the high SUV-N subgroup: a long-term outcome study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical-Oriented Hierarchical Machine Learning Framework for Early Kidney Tumor Detection and Malignant Subtype Classification.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Recent advances in theranostics and oncology PET: emerging radionuclides and targets.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Spectral computed tomography parameters of primary tumors and lymph nodes for predicting tumor deposits in colorectal cancer.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe lymph node to primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio (NTR) is an innovative parameter derived from positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans that captures the intricate relationship between primary tumors and associated lymph nodes. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic value of NTR in cancer patients.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies investigating the association between NTR and survival outcomes in cancer patients. The pooled adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
resultsTwelve studies comprising a total of 2037 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Elevated NTR was significantly associated with worse overall survival aHR (2.21, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.99), disease-free survival aHR (3.27, 95% CI 2.12 to 5.05), and distant metastasis-free survival aHR (2.07, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.78) in cancer patients. Subgroup analyses by cancer type showed consistent results across various malignancies, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides evidence for a significant association between elevated NTR and worse survival outcomes in cancer patients. Elevated NTR may serve as a useful prognostic biomarker for cancer patients and could potentially be used to guide treatment decisions and monitor disease progression. Future studies should aim to validate these findings in larger and more diverse patient populations and investigate the underlying mechanisms for the observed association between NTR and survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38724805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.