Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724768›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Longitudinal ultrasound-based AI model predicts axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a multicenter study.

Ying Fu, Yu-Tao Lei, Yu-Hong Huang, Fang Mei, Song Wang, Kun Yan, Yi-Hua Wang, Yi-Han Ma, Li-Gang Cui

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Artificial intelligence in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: current advances and challenges].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying Fu *Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yu-Tao Lei *Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yu-Hong HuangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Fang MeiDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China.
Song WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Kun YanDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Yi-Hua WangDepartment of Ultrasound, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, 73 South Jianshe Road, Lubei District, Tangshan, 066300, China.
Yi-Han MaDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Li-Gang CuiDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. cuiligang_bysy@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-7445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeveloping a deep learning radiomics model from longitudinal breast ultrasound and sonographer's axillary ultrasound diagnosis for predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer.

methodsBreast cancer patients undergoing NAC followed by surgery were recruited from three centers between November 2016 and December 2022. We collected ultrasound images for extracting tumor-derived radiomics and deep learning features, selecting quantitative features through various methods. Two machine learning models based on random forest were developed using pre-NAC and post-NAC features. A support vector machine integrated these data into a fusion model, evaluated via the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and calibration curves. We compared the fusion model's performance against sonographer's diagnosis from pre-NAC and post-NAC axillary ultrasonography, referencing histological outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection.

resultsIn the validation cohort, the fusion model outperformed both pre-NAC (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.786, p < 0.001) and post-NAC models (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.853, p = 0.014), as well as the sonographer's diagnosis of ALN status on pre-NAC and post-NAC axillary ultrasonography (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.719, p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis revealed patient benefits from the fusion model across threshold probabilities from 0.02 to 0.98. The model also enhanced sonographer's diagnostic ability, increasing accuracy from 71.9% to 79.2%.

conclusionThe deep learning radiomics model accurately predicted the ALN response to NAC in breast cancer. Furthermore, the model will assist sonographers to improve their diagnostic ability on ALN status before surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our AI model based on pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy ultrasound can accurately predict axillary lymph node metastasis and assist sonographer's axillary diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Axillary lymph node metastasis status affects the choice of surgical treatment, and currently relies on subjective ultrasound. Our AI model outperformed sonographer's visual diagnosis on axillary ultrasound. Our deep learning radiomics model can improve sonographers' diagnosis and might assist in surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsUltrasonography, MammaryArtificial intelligenceAxillary lymph node metastasisBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38724768
PMCPMC11519196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.