ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Assessing deep learning reconstruction for faster prostate MRI: visual vs. diagnostic performance metrics.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The scientific evidence of commercial AI products for MRI acceleration: a systematic review.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic assessment of artificial intelligence reconstruction on accelerated prostate MRI: a retrospective, paired, multi-reader multi-case study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning reconstruction versus conventional parallel imaging for sagittal T2-weighted MRI in cervical cancer: a comparison of acceleration factors.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of abbreviated biparametric MRI for prostate cancer screening: a prospective feasibility study (ReIMAGINE study).European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Addressing Current Limitations Through Emerging Technologies.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Cross-Scanner Harmonization of AI/DL Accelerated Quantitative Bi-Parametric Prostate MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prostate MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction in Response to Cancer Screening Demands-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of non-contrast-enhanced imaging input sequences on the generation of virtual contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans using neural network.European radiology · 2025Article
- Emerging and anticipated innovations in prostate cancer MRI and their impact on patient care.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDeep learning (DL) MRI reconstruction enables fast scan acquisition with good visual quality, but the diagnostic impact is often not assessed because of large reader study requirements. This study used existing diagnostic DL to assess the diagnostic quality of reconstructed images. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective multisite study of 1535 patients assessed biparametric prostate MRI between 2016 and 2020. Likely clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) lesions (PI-RADS
resultsDLRecon improved visual quality at 4- and 8-fold (R4, R8) subsampling rates, with SSIM (range: -1 to 1) improved to 0.78 ± 0.02 (p < 0.001) and 0.67 ± 0.03 (p < 0.001) from 0.68 ± 0.03 and 0.51 ± 0.03, respectively. However, diagnostic performance at R4 showed a pAUC FROC of 1.33 (CI 1.28-1.39) for DL and 1.29 (CI 1.23-1.35) for naive reconstructions, both significantly lower than fully sampled pAUC of 1.58 (DL: p = 0.024, naïve: p = 0.02). Similar trends were noted for R8.
conclusionDL reconstruction produces visually appealing images but may reduce diagnostic accuracy. Incorporating diagnostic AI into the assessment framework offers a clinically relevant metric essential for adopting reconstruction models into clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In clinical settings, caution is warranted when using DL reconstruction for MRI scans. While it recovered visual quality, it failed to match the prostate cancer detection rates observed in scans not subjected to acceleration and DL reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.