Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724745›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025

Population health implications of exposure to pervasive military aircraft noise pollution.

Giordano Jacuzzi, Lauren M Kuehne, Anne Harvey, Christine Hurley, Robert Wilbur, Edmund Seto, Julian D Olden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Noise: a public health problem.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giordano JacuzziSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. gioj@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4351-5682
Lauren M KuehneOmfishient Consulting, Bremerton, WA, 98310, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-613X
Anne HarveySound Defense Alliance, PO Box 373, Coupeville, WA, 98239, USA.
Christine HurleySound Defense Alliance, PO Box 373, Coupeville, WA, 98239, USA.
Robert WilburCitizens of Ebey's Reserve, PO Box 202, Coupeville, WA, 98239, USA.
Edmund SetoSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-0313
Julian D OldenSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-1187

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the adverse health effects of civil aircraft noise are relatively well studied, impacts associated with more intense and intermittent noise from military aviation have been rarely assessed. In recent years, increased training at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, USA has raised concerns regarding the public health and well-being implications of noise from military aviation.

objectiveThis study assessed the public health risks of military aircraft noise by developing a systematic workflow that uses acoustic and aircraft operations data to map noise exposure and predict health outcomes at the population scale.

methodsAcoustic data encompassing seven years of monitoring efforts were integrated with flight operations data for 2020-2021 and a Department of Defense noise simulation model to characterize the noise regime. The model produced contours for day-night, nighttime, and 24-h average levels, which were validated by field monitoring and mapped to yield the estimated noise burden. Established thresholds and exposure-response relationships were used to predict the population subject to potential noise-related health effects, including annoyance, sleep disturbance, hearing impairment, and delays in childhood learning.

resultsOver 74,000 people within the area of aircraft noise exposure were at risk of adverse health effects. Of those exposed, substantial numbers were estimated to be highly annoyed and highly sleep disturbed, and several schools were exposed to levels that place them at risk of delay in childhood learning. Noise in some areas exceeded thresholds established by federal regulations for public health, residential land use and noise mitigation action, as well as the ranges of established exposure-response relationships. IMPACT STATEMENT: This study quantified the extensive spatial scale and population health burden of noise from military aviation. We employed a novel GIS-based workflow for relating mapped distributions of aircraft noise exposure to a suite of public health outcomes by integrating acoustic monitoring and simulation data with a dasymetric population density map. This approach enables the evaluation of population health impacts due to past, current, and future proposed military operations. Moreover, it can be modified for application to other environmental noise sources and offers an improved open-source tool to assess the population health implications of environmental noise exposure, inform at-risk communities, and guide efforts in noise mitigation and policy governing noise legislation, urban planning, and land use.

Indexed as

AircraftEnvironmental ExposureMilitary PersonnelNoise, TransportationPopulation HealthEnvironmental MonitoringHumansAnnoyanceDasymetricEnvironmental noiseExposure-responseNoise assessmentSleep disturbance

Identifiers

PMID38724745
PMCPMC11876064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.