ArticleCell and tissue banking2024
Biomechanical and histological comparison of two suture configurations for soft tissue grafts: speedtrap™ versus krackow stitch.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Suture techniques in the surgical management of flexor tendon, Achilles tendon and cruciate ligament injuries: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Influencing factors on mechanical properties of tendon-suture system during graft preparation: a multiple linear regression analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Needleless graft preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand semitendinosus autograft: a biomechanical in vitro study using a porcine model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare 2 different graft preparation techniques to determine biomechanical strength and resultant tissue trauma evaluated by histology. Twelve common flexors of the finger's tendons were prepared with either tubulization (SpeedTrap™) or transtendon stiches (Orthocord™). The stiffness, resistance and energy at maximum load were tested for biomechanical assessment in both groups. After load testing, Samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) to evaluate histological damage. We observe that the time to prepare tendons with SpeedTrap™ was 8.3 times faster (1:25 min) than traditional ones (15:02 min). In all cases, the mean values for SpeedTrap™ were higher in terms of strength, stiffness and energy at maximum load than for traditional suture but without significant difference (p > 0.05). The Krackow stitch produces greater structural damage to the collagen fibers while SpeedTrap™ maintains better organized arrangement of the fibers after tubulization preparation. With the results obtained, we can conclude that the tubulization technique allows faster graft preparation with less structural damage to the manipulated tissue without altering the biomechanical resistance provided by the transtendon suture technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38724712What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.