Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724590›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

CH

Keiko Konya, Tetsuo Sueyoshi, Go Iwahana, Tomoaki Morishita, Jun Uetake, Masahide Wakita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keiko Konya *Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, 236-0001, Japan.
Tetsuo Sueyoshi *Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, 236-0001, Japan. sue@jamstec.go.jp.
Go IwahanaInternational Arctic Research Center (IARC), University of Alaska, Fairbanks (UAF), Fairbanks, 99775, USA.
Tomoaki MorishitaTohoku Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Morioka, 020-0123, Japan.
Jun UetakeHokkaido University, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Tomakomai, 053-0035, Japan.
Masahide WakitaJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Mutsu, 035-0022, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JPMXD142031886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have observed high methane concentrations in runoff water and the ambient air at various glacier sites, including the Greenland Ice Sheet, the glacier forefield in Svalbard, and the ice cap in Iceland. This study extends these findings to smaller mountain glaciers in Alaska. Methane and carbon dioxide concentrations in the ambient air near the meltwater outlet, fluxes of these gases at the surface of runoff water and riverbank sediments, and dissolved methane content in the runoff water were measured at four glaciers. Three of the four glaciers showed conspicuous signals of methane emissions from runoff water, with the Castner Glacier terminus exhibiting a methane concentration three times higher than background levels, along with elevated dissolved methane levels in the runoff water. This study marks the detection of significant methane emissions from small mountain glacier runoff, contributing to the understanding that mountain glaciers also release methane into the atmosphere.

Identifiers

PMID38724590
PMCPMC11082196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.