Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724284›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Electrophysiological Correlates of Dentate Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Poststroke Motor Recovery.

Raghavan Gopalakrishnan, David A Cunningham, Olivia Hogue, Madeleine Schroedel, Brett A Campbell, Kenneth B Baker, Andre G Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research progress on the neuromodulation targets in stroke rehabilitation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raghavan GopalakrishnanCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
David A CunninghamCleveland FES Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.
Olivia HogueCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
Madeleine SchroedelCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
Brett A CampbellDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-9727
Kenneth B BakerCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
Andre G MachadoCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 machada@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-5610

Funding

Deep cerebellar electrical stimulation for post-stroke motor recoveryUH3NS100543 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BAKER, KENNETH B, MACHADO, ANDRE GUELMAN · 2016 to 2021
$4.9M
NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS100543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While ipsilesional cortical electroencephalography has been associated with poststroke recovery mechanisms and outcomes, the role of the cerebellum and its interaction with the ipsilesional cortex is still largely unknown. We have previously shown that poststroke motor control relies on increased corticocerebellar coherence (CCC) in the low beta band to maintain motor task accuracy and to compensate for decreased excitability of the ipsilesional cortex. We now extend our work to investigate corticocerebellar network changes associated with chronic stimulation of the dentato-thalamo-cortical pathway aimed at promoting poststroke motor rehabilitation. We investigated the excitability of the ipsilesional cortex, the dentate (DN), and their interaction as a function of treatment outcome measures. Relative to baseline, 10 human participants (two women) at the end of 4-8 months of DN deep brain stimulation (DBS) showed (1) significantly improved motor control indexed by computerized motor tasks; (2) significant increase in ipsilesional premotor cortex event-related desynchronization that correlated with improvements in motor function; and (3) significant decrease in CCC, including causal interactions between the DN and ipsilesional cortex, which also correlated with motor function improvements. Furthermore, we show that the functional state of the DN in the poststroke state and its connectivity with the ipsilesional cortex were predictive of motor outcomes associated with DN-DBS. The findings suggest that as participants recovered, the ipsilesional cortex became more involved in motor control, with less demand on the cerebellum to support task planning and execution. Our data provide unique mechanistic insights into the functional state of corticocerebellar-cortical network after stroke and its modulation by DN-DBS.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NucleiDeep Brain StimulationRecovery of FunctionStrokeAdultAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexStroke Rehabilitationcerebellar dentatedeep brain stimulationEEGlocal field potentialsrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID38724284
PMCPMC11223455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.