ReviewDrug testing and analysis2025
The use of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH), a data-independent acquisition high-resolution mass spectrometry approach, in forensic toxicological regimes: A review.
Review in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery of Cardioprotective Markers in Huangqi Shengmai Yin via Integrated UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS Fingerprinting, Chemometric Quality Assessment, and Bioactivity Correlation.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Integrative proteomics and metabolomics advance early cancer detection and targeted therapy with emerging technologies and clinical applications.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Relevance of proteomics and metabolomics approaches to overview the tumorigenesis and better management of cancer.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- The use of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH), a data-independent acquisition high-resolution mass spectrometry approach, in forensic toxicological regimes: A review.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Review
- Integrative Analysis of Multi-Omics Data to Identify Deregulated Molecular Pathways and Druggable Targets in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH) is a type of high-resolution mass spectrometry that uses data-independent acquisition. Compared with more targeted acquisition schemes, the power behind this data-independent acquisition technique comes from its ability to mitigate interferences via the use of SWATH acquisition windows (Q1 quadrupole isolation windows) while still obtaining all accurate mass information. However, consistent with high-resolution mass spectrometry techniques, its routine and high throughput implementation in forensic toxicology is limited due to the complex processing power required to effectively manage the large amount of acquired data. It is therefore pivotal to create an efficient and validated identification criterion that confidently reports suspected positive detections as a confirmational technique for final reporting. This review examines all publications that implemented SWATH in a forensic toxicological framework with suggestive best practices and commonly used criteria. Seventeen publications were reviewed for extraction, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry parameters, and more specifically for all SWATH applicable characteristics including spray voltages, collision energies and spreads, mass error, isotopic ratio difference, retention time error, and library score thresholds. Notwithstanding the challenges SWATH implementation faces for a laboratory, the technique demonstrates its potential to be utilized in routine forensic toxicology testing regimes and aids in the detection of both common and emerging novel drugs simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.