Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38724052›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Six aspects of female genital mutilation education (SAFE) model: findings from a qualitative study.

Susan Waigwa, Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Lucy Doos, Julie Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan WaigwaUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK s.m.waigwa@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2725-9472
Caroline Bradbury-JonesUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lucy DoosPublic Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Julie TaylorSchool of Nursing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-0906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecent figures show that over 200 million women and girls, globally, live with the consequences of female genital mutilation (FGM). Complex debilitating physical, psychological and social problems result from the practice. Health education interventions have proven to be essential in both preventing the practice and informing support of survivors. In this study, we aimed to explore factors that affect the effectiveness of health education interventions.

designA generic qualitative approach was applied using semistructured individual and focus group interviews with women and men from communities with a history of FGM in Birmingham, UK. Framework analysis was used to group recurring themes from the data. Intersectionality was used as a theoretical lens to synthesise findings.

participantsTwenty-one individuals (18 women and 3 men) participated in semistructured individual and focus group interviews about their views and experiences of health and well-being intervention programmes related to FGM.

resultsSix themes emerged from the data and were developed into a model of issues relating to FGM education. These six themes are (1) active communication, (2) attitudes and beliefs, (3) knowledge about FGM, (4) social structures, (5) programme approach and (6) the better future. A combined discussion of all these issues was compressed into three groupings: social structures, culture and media.

conclusionThe results of this study depict aspects associated with FGM education that should be considered by future interventions aiming to prevent the practice and inform support services for survivors in a holistic way.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleFocus GroupsHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung Adultchild protectionnursing carepatient-centered carepublic healthqualitative researchreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID38724052
PMCPMC11086540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.