ArticleReproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)2024
Screening and characterization of 133 physiologically-relevant environmental chemicals for reproductive toxicity.
Article in Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Accelerated Analysis ofResearch square · 2026Article
- Toxicity of Four Common Environmental Chemicals Across Caenorhabditis elegans Life Stages Supporting the One Health Concept.Environmental toxicology · 2026Article
- A robust, high-content NAM for repeatable and predictive developmental and reproductive toxicity assessment in C. elegans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Robust, High-Content NAM for Repeatable and Predictive Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Assessment in C. elegans.Research square · 2026Article
- A systems toxicology approach implicates post-transcriptional regulatory networks in reproductive defects from PFAS exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- Exposures to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals among Children Aged 2 to 4 Years in the United States Environmental Influences on the Child Health Outcome (ECHO) Cohort.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Non-Targeted Analysis of Environmental Contaminants and Their Associations with Semen Health Factors in Men from New York City.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Reproductive & developmental toxicity of quaternary ammonium compounds†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproduction is a functional outcome that relies on complex cellular, tissue, and organ interactions that span the developmental period to adulthood. Thus, the assessment of its disruption by environmental chemicals would benefit significantly from scalable and innovative approaches to testing using functionally comparable reproductive models such as the nematode C. elegans. We adapted a previously described low-throughput in vivo chromosome segregation assay using C. elegans predictive of reproductive toxicity and leveraged available public data sources (ToxCast, ICE) to screen and characterize 133 physiologically-relevant chemicals in a high-throughput manner. The screening outcome was further validated in a second, independent in vivo assay assessing embryonic viability. In total, 13 chemicals were classified as reproductive toxicants with the two most active chemicals belonging to the large family of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) commonly used as disinfectants but with limited available reproductive toxicity data. We compared the results from the C. elegans assay with ToxCast in vitro data compiled from 700+ cell response assays and 300+ signaling pathways-based assays. We did not observe a difference in the bioactivity or in the average potency (AC50) between the top and bottom chemicals. However, the intended target categories were significantly different between the classified chemicals with, in particular, an over-representation of steroid hormone targets for the high Z-score chemicals. Taken together, these results point to the value of in vivo models that scale to high-throughput level for reproductive toxicity assessment and to the need to prioritize the assessment of QACs impacts on reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.