ArticlePloS one2024
Feature selection algorithm based on optimized genetic algorithm and the application in high-dimensional data processing.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Multi-Strategy Chinese Pangolin Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Information-Processing Entropy and Heterogeneous Sentiment Reaction Windows: Evidence from S&P 500 Stocks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring quantum control landscape and solution space complexity through optimization algorithms and dimensionality reduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anti-cancer activity elucidation of geissolosimine as an MDM2-p53 interaction inhibitor: An in-silico study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approach and Bioinformatics Analysis Discovered Key Genomic Signatures for Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocyte Remodeling and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Hybrid feature selection framework for enhanced credit card fraud detection using machine learning models.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dimensional data is widely used in many fields, but selecting key features from it is challenging. Feature selection can reduce data dimensionality and weaken noise interference, thereby improving model efficiency and enhancing model interpretability. In order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of high-dimensional data processing, a feature selection method based on optimized genetic algorithm is proposed in this study. The algorithm simulates the process of natural selection, searches for possible subsets of feature, and finds the subsets of feature that optimizes the performance of the model. The results show that when the value of K is less than 4 or more than 8, the recognition rate is very low. After adaptive bias filtering, 724 features are filtered to 372, and the accuracy is improved from 0.9352 to 0.9815. From 714 features to 406 Gaussian codes, the accuracy is improved from 0.9625 to 0.9754. Among all tests, the colon has the highest average accuracy, followed by small round blue cell tumor(SRBCT), lymphoma, central nervous system(CNS) and ovaries. The green curve is the best, with stable performance and a time range of 0-300. While maintaining the efficiency, it can reach 4.48 as soon as possible. The feature selection method has practical significance for high-dimensional data processing, improves the efficiency and accuracy of data processing, and provides an effective new method for high-dimensional data processing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.