Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38723059›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2024

Evaluation of deep learning estimation of whole heart anatomy from automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance short- and long-axis analyses in UK Biobank.

Marica Muffoletto, Hao Xu, Richard Burns, Avan Suinesiaputra, Anastasia Nasopoulou, Karl P Kunze, Radhouene Neji, Steffen E Petersen, Steven A Niederer, Daniel Rueckert and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marica MuffolettoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-0054
Hao XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.
Richard BurnsSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.
Avan SuinesiaputraSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.
Anastasia NasopoulouSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.
Karl P KunzeSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.
Radhouene NejiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6543-4390
Steffen E PetersenWilliam Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Steven A NiedererCardiac Electro Mechanics Research Group, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Daniel RueckertDepartment of Computing, Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-5889
Alistair A YoungSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-4220

Funding

The Cardiac Atlas ProjectR01HL121754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCCULLOCH, ANDREW D., OMENS, JEFFREY H. · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Smart Medical ImagingEPSRC Centre for Medical EngineeringLondon Medical Imaging & Artificial Intelligence CentreNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121754Siemens HealthineersWellcomeWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStandard methods of heart chamber volume estimation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) typically utilize simple geometric formulae based on a limited number of slices. We aimed to evaluate whether an automated deep learning neural network prediction of 3D anatomy of all four chambers would show stronger associations with cardiovascular risk factors and disease than standard volume estimation methods in the UK Biobank. METHODS AND

resultsA deep learning network was adapted to predict 3D segmentations of left and right ventricles (LV, RV) and atria (LA, RA) at ∼1 mm isotropic resolution from CMR short- and long-axis 2D segmentations obtained from a fully automated machine learning pipeline in 4723 individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 5733 without in the UK Biobank. Relationships between volumes at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) and risk/disease factors were quantified using univariate, multivariate, and logistic regression analyses. Strength of association between deep learning volumes and standard volumes was compared using the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC). Univariate and multivariate associations between deep learning volumes and most risk and disease factors were stronger than for standard volumes (higher R2 and more significant P-values), particularly for sex, age, and body mass index. AUCs for all logistic regressions were higher for deep learning volumes than standard volumes (P < 0.001 for all four chambers at ED and ES).

conclusionNeural network reconstructions of whole heart volumes had significantly stronger associations with CVD and risk factors than standard volume estimation methods in an automatic processing pipeline.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAgedBiological Specimen BanksCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedUK BiobankUnited Kingdomdeep learningdense segmentationsdisease factorsregressionrisk factorsvolume estimates

Identifiers

PMID38723059
PMCPMC11441036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.