Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38723025›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities.

Jee Young Kim, Alifia Hasan, Katherine C Kellogg, William Ratliff, Sara G Murray, Harini Suresh, Alexandra Valladares, Keo Shaw, Danny Tobey, David E Vidal and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jee Young KimDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4850-9757
Alifia HasanDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Katherine C KelloggSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-3498
William RatliffDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Sara G MurrayDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Harini SureshCornell University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Alexandra ValladaresCommunity representative, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8613-1717
Keo ShawFDA Regulatory Group, DLA Piper, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Danny TobeyAI and Data Analytics, DLA Piper, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
David E VidalCenter for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mark A LifsonCenter for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Manesh PatelDivision of Cardiology, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Inioluwa Deborah RajiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Michael GaoDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
William KnechtleDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Linda TangSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Suresh BaluDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Mark P SendakDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of data-driven technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is growing in healthcare. However, the proliferation of healthcare AI tools has outpaced regulatory frameworks, accountability measures, and governance standards to ensure safe, effective, and equitable use. To address these gaps and tackle a common challenge faced by healthcare delivery organizations, a case-based workshop was organized, and a framework was developed to evaluate the potential impact of implementing an AI solution on health equity. The Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL) is co-designed with extensive engagement of clinical, operational, technical, and regulatory leaders across healthcare delivery organizations and ecosystem partners in the US. It assesses 5 equity assessment domains-accountability, fairness, fitness for purpose, reliability and validity, and transparency-across the span of eight key decision points in the AI adoption lifecycle. It is a process-oriented framework containing 37 step-by-step procedures for evaluating an existing AI solution and 34 procedures for evaluating a new AI solution in total. Within each procedure, it identifies relevant key stakeholders and data sources used to conduct the procedure. HEAAL guides how healthcare delivery organizations may mitigate the potential risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities. It also informs how much resources and support are required to assess the potential impact of AI solutions on health inequities.

Identifiers

PMID38723025
PMCPMC11081364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.