ArticlePloS one2024
On the sensitivity of centrality metrics.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural language processing reveals network structure of pain communication in social media using discrete mathematical analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Water Health Open Knowledge Graph.Scientific data · 2025Article
- From variability to stability: Sensitivity of network properties in IBD human gut microbiome studies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the huge importance that the centrality metrics have in understanding the topology of a network, too little is known about the effects that small alterations in the topology of the input graph induce in the norm of the vector that stores the node centralities. If so, then it could be possible to avoid re-calculating the vector of centrality metrics if some minimal changes occur in the network topology, which would allow for significant computational savings. Hence, after formalising the notion of centrality, three of the most basic metrics were herein considered (i.e., Degree, Eigenvector, and Katz centrality). To perform the simulations, two probabilistic failure models were used to describe alterations in network topology: Uniform (i.e., all nodes can be independently deleted from the network with a fixed probability) and Best Connected (i.e., the probability a node is removed depends on its degree). Our analysis suggests that, in the case of degree, small variations in the topology of the input graph determine small variations in Degree centrality, independently of the topological features of the input graph; conversely, both Eigenvector and Katz centralities can be extremely sensitive to changes in the topology of the input graph. In other words, if the input graph has some specific features, even small changes in the topology of the input graph can have catastrophic effects on the Eigenvector or Katz centrality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.