Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722922›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in India: A primary study based on health behavior theories and 5C psychological antecedents model.

Sumit Aggarwal, Lucky Singh, Umaer Alam, Saurabh Sharma, Shashi Kala Saroj, Kamran Zaman, Mohd Usman, Rajni Kant, Himanshu Kumar Chaturvedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sumit AggarwalIndian Council of Medical Research- Headquarters (ICMR-Hqrs), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0652-1611
Lucky SinghICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2590-6135
Umaer AlamICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0009-0007-3221-4985
Saurabh SharmaICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Shashi Kala SarojICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-7446
Kamran ZamanICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0172-7423
Mohd UsmanICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-8119
Rajni KantICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Himanshu Kumar ChaturvediICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the significant success of India's COVID-19 vaccination program, a sizeable proportion of the adult population remains unvaccinated or has received a single dose of the vaccine. Despite the recommendations of the Government of India for the two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and the precautionary booster dose, many people were still hesitant towards the COVID-19 full vaccination. Hence, this study aimed to identify the primary behavioral and psychological factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy. Cross-sectional data was collected via a multi-stage sampling design by using a scheduled sample survey in the Gorakhpur district of Uttar Pradesh, India, between 15 July 2022 to 30 September 2022. This study has utilized three health behavior models-the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the 5C Psychological Antecedents of vaccination, and employed bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression model to assess the level of vaccine hesitancy and predictive health behavior of the respondents. Results indicate that among the constructs of the HBM and 5C Antecedents models, "perceived benefits", "confidence" and "collective responsibility" showed a lesser likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. However, in the TPB model constructs, a 'negative attitude towards the vaccine' showed a four times higher likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. From the future policy perspective, this study suggested that addressing the issue of 'negative attitudes towards the vaccine' and increasing the trust or confidence for the vaccine through increasing awareness about the benefits of the vaccination in India may reduce vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth BehaviorVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Belief ModelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38722922
PMCPMC11081298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.