Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Identification of the needs and priorities of older people and stakeholders in rural and urban areas of Santo Andre, Brazil.

Danyela Casadei Donatelli, Dina Goodman-Palmer, Maria Lisa Odland, Sandra Agyapong-Badu, Natalia da Cruz-Alves, Meire Rosenburg, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Carolyn Greig, Justine Davies, Vânia Barbosa do Nascimento and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Danyela Casadei DonatelliCollective Health Centro Universitário FMABC, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Dina Goodman-PalmerInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9997-4603
Maria Lisa OdlandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-7145
Sandra Agyapong-BaduSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Natalia da Cruz-AlvesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Meire RosenburgDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Lisa R HirschhornDepartment of Medical Social Sciences and Havey Institute of Global Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
Carolyn GreigSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-9997
Justine DaviesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6834-1838
Vânia Barbosa do NascimentoCollective Health Centro Universitário FMABC, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo FerriolliFaculdade de Medicina, Laboratorio de Investigaçao Medica em Envelhecimento (LIM-66), Serviço de Geriatria, Hospital das Clinicas, Disciplina de Geriatria, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-2451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few data reporting the needs and priorities of older adults in Brazil. This hampers the development and/or implementation of policies aimed at older adults to help them age well. The aim of this study was to understand areas of importance, priorities, enablers and obstacles to healthy ageing as identified by older adults and key stakeholders in both urban and rural environments.

methodsTwo locations were selected, one urban and one rural in the municipality of Santo André, in the metropolitan region of São Paulo (SP). Workshops for older adults (>60 y) and stakeholders were conducted separately in each location. The workshops incorporated an iterative process of discussion, prioritisation and ranking of responses, in roundtable groups and in plenary. Areas of commonality and differences between older adult and stakeholder responses were identified by comparing responses between groups as well as mapping obstacles and enablers to healthy ageing identified by older adults, to the priorities identified by stakeholder groups. The socio-ecologic model was used to categorise responses.

resultsThere were few shared responses between stakeholders and older adults and little overlap between the top ranked responses of urban and rural groups. With respect to areas of importance, both stakeholder groups ranked policies for older people within their top five reponses. Both older adult groups ranked keeping physically and mentally active, and nurturing spirituality. There was a marked lack of congruence between older adults' obstacles and enablers to healthy ageing and stakeholder priorities, in both urban and rural settings. Most responses were located within the Society domain of the socio-ecologic model, although older adults also responded within the Individual/ Relationships domains, particularly in ranking areas of most importance for healthy ageing.

conclusionsOur results highlight substantial differences between older adults and stakeholders with respect to areas of importance, priorities, enablers and obstacles to healthy ageing, and point to the need for more engagement between those in advocacy and policymaking roles and the older people whose needs they serve.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationUrban PopulationAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilFemaleHealth PrioritiesHealth Services Needs and DemandHealthy AgingHumansMaleMiddle AgedStakeholder Participation

Identifiers

PMID38722852
PMCPMC11081258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.