Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722850›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The relationship between object-based spatial ability and virtual navigation performance.

Tanya Garg, Pablo Fernández Velasco, Eva Zita Patai, Charlotte P Malcolm, Victor Kovalets, Veronique D Bohbot, Antoine Coutrot, Mary Hegarty, Michael Hornberger, Hugo J Spiers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Individual differences in navigation skill: towards reliable and valid measures.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning the layout of different environments: common or dissociated abilities?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tanya GargDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-7140
Pablo Fernández VelascoDepartment of Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eva Zita PataiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte P MalcolmDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Victor KovaletsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Veronique D BohbotFaculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, McGill, Canada.
Antoine CoutrotLIRIS-CNRS-Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Mary HegartyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Michael HornbergerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Hugo J SpiersDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial navigation is a multi-faceted behaviour drawing on many different aspects of cognition. Visuospatial abilities, such as mental rotation and visuospatial working memory, in particular, may be key factors. A range of tests have been developed to assess visuospatial processing and memory, but how such tests relate to navigation ability remains unclear. This understanding is important to advance tests of navigation for disease monitoring in various disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) where spatial impairment is an early symptom. Here, we report the use of an established mobile gaming app, Sea Hero Quest (SHQ), as a measure of navigation ability in a sample of young, predominantly female university students (N = 78; 20; female = 74.3%; mean age = 20.33 years). We used three separate tests of navigation embedded in SHQ: wayfinding, path integration and spatial memory in a radial arm maze. In the same participants, we also collected measures of mental rotation (Mental Rotation Test), visuospatial processing (Design Organization Test) and visuospatial working memory (Digital Corsi). We found few strong correlations across our measures. Being good at wayfinding in a virtual navigation test does not mean an individual will also be good at path integration, have a superior memory in a radial arm maze, or rate themself as having a strong sense of direction. However, we observed that participants who were good in the wayfinding task of SHQ tended to perform well on the three visuospatial tasks examined here, and to also use a landmark strategy in the radial maze task. These findings help clarify the associations between different abilities involved in spatial navigation.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMaze LearningMemory, Short-TermMobile ApplicationsSpace PerceptionSpatial MemoryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38722850
PMCPMC11081363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.