Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722803›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2024

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases of gastric origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Niels A D Guchelaar, Kazem Nasserinejad, Bianca Mostert, Stijn L W Koolen, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen, Bo J Noordman

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus intravenous fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and nivolumab for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: results from the IPLUS Phase II study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Niels A D GuchelaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8080-9093
Kazem NasserinejadDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bianca MostertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5193-0820
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter C van der SluisDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd M LagardeDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-3697
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bo J NoordmanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3405-5339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer with peritoneal metastases is associated with a dismal prognosis. Normothermic catheter-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy and normothermic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) are methods to deliver chemotherapy intraperitoneally leading to higher intraperitoneal concentrations of cytotoxic drugs compared to intravenous administration. We reviewed the effectiveness and safety of different methods of palliative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

methodsEmbase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched for articles studying the use of repeated administration of palliative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases, published up to January 2024. The primary outcome was overall survival.

resultsTwenty-three studies were included, representing a total of 999 patients. The pooled median overall survival was 14.5 months. The pooled hazard ratio of the two RCTs using intraperitoneal paclitaxel and docetaxel favoured the intraperitoneal chemotherapy arm. The median overall survival of intraperitoneal paclitaxel, intraperitoneal docetaxel and PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin were respectively 18.4 months, 13.2 months and 9.0 months. All treatment methods had a relatively safe toxicity profile. Conversion surgery after completion of intraperitoneal therapy was performed in 16% of the patients.

conclusionsRepeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, regardless of method of administration, is safe for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases. Conversion surgery after completion of the intraperitoneal chemotherapy is possible in a subset of patients.

Indexed as

Peritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDocetaxelHumansInfusions, ParenteralPaclitaxelPalliative CareAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID38722803
PMCPMC11081074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.