Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722793›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024

Top-Down Proteomics Analysis of Picogram-Level Complex Samples Using Spray-Capillary-Based Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry.

Zhitao Zhao, Yanting Guo, Trishika Chowdhury, Samin Anjum, Jiaxue Li, Lushuang Huang, Kellye A Cupp-Sutton, Anthony Burgett, Dingjing Shi, Si Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhitao ZhaoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Yanting GuoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Trishika ChowdhuryDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alabama, 250 Hackberry Ln, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, United States.
Samin AnjumDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alabama, 250 Hackberry Ln, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, United States.
Jiaxue LiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Lushuang HuangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Kellye A Cupp-SuttonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alabama, 250 Hackberry Ln, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, United States.
Anthony BurgettDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, 1110 N. Stonewall Ave., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-5144
Dingjing ShiDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, 455 W Lindsey Street, Norman, Oklahoma 73069, United States.
Si WuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-7359

Funding

Translation of immunologic technologies from basic research into pre-clinical nonU19AI062629 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI COGGESHALL, KENNETH MARK · 2004 to 2023
$56.2M
Structure-Function Studies of MsvR, a Methanogen-Specific Transcriptional RegulaP20GM103640 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI THOMAS, LEONARD M · 2012 to 2021
$20.4M
Protein Production and Characterization CoreP30GM145423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI ANN H WEST · 2022 to 2026
$6.9M
Quantitative Analysis of Serum Autoantibody Repertories in Systemic Lupus ErythematosusR01AI141625 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SINGH, SHANTERI, SMITH, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141625NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI062629NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103640NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM145423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics analysis of mass-limited samples has become increasingly important for understanding biological systems in physiologically relevant contexts such as patient samples, multicellular organoids, spheroids, and single cells. However, relatively low sensitivity in top-down proteomics methods makes their application to mass-limited samples challenging. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) has emerged as an ideal separation method for mass-limited samples due to its high separation resolution, ultralow detection limit, and minimal sample volume requirements. Recently, we developed "spray-capillary", an electrospray ionization (ESI)-assisted device, that is capable of quantitative ultralow-volume sampling (e.g., pL-nL level). Here, we developed a spray-capillary-CE-MS platform for ultrasensitive top-down proteomics analysis of intact proteins in mass-limited complex biological samples. Specifically, to improve the sensitivity of the spray-capillary platform, we incorporated a polyethylenimine (PEI)-coated capillary and optimized the spray-capillary inner diameter. Under optimized conditions, we successfully detected over 200 proteoforms from 50 pg of

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, CapillaryProteomicsEscherichia coliHumansMass SpectrometrySpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

Identifiers

PMID38722793
PMCPMC11812130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.