Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722679›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

The Primary Care and Environmental Health e-Learning Course to Integrate Environmental Health in General Practice: Before-and-After Feasibility Study.

Jean-Baptiste Tostain, Marina Mathieu, Agnès Oude Engberink, Bernard Clary, Michel Amouyal, Béatrice Lognos, Pascal Demoly, Isabella Annesi-Maesano, Grégory Ninot, Nicolas Molinari and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jean-Baptiste TostainDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7470-6275
Marina MathieuClinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5937-9419
Agnès Oude EngberinkDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-2626
Bernard ClaryDepartement of General Practice, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-8954
Michel AmouyalDepartement of General Practice, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-6556
Béatrice LognosDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1032-3167
Pascal DemolyDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-7964
Isabella Annesi-MaesanoDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6340-9300
Grégory NinotDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-9169
Nicolas MolinariDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0088
Arnaud RichardUniversity of Toulon, Toulon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-4036
Maha BadreddineDepartment of Pedagogical Engineering and Audiovisual Production, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3448-471X
Claire DuflosClinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-530X
Francois CarbonnelDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-4798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental and behavioral factors are responsible for 12.6 million deaths annually and contribute to 25% of deaths and chronic diseases worldwide. Through the One Health initiative, the World Health Organization and other international health organizations plan to improve these indicators to create healthier environments by 2030. To meet this challenge, training primary care professionals should be the priority of national policies. General practitioners (GPs) are ready to become involved but need in-depth training to gain and apply environmental health (EH) knowledge to their practice. In response, we designed the Primary Care Environment and Health (PCEH) online course in partnership with the Occitanie Regional Health Agency in France. This course was used to train GP residents from the Montpelier-Nimes Faculty of Medicine in EH knowledge. The course was organized in 2 successive parts: (1) an asynchronous e-learning modular course focusing on EH knowledge and tools and (2) 1 day of face-to-face sessions.

objectiveThis study assessed the impact of the e-learning component of the PCEH course on participants' satisfaction, knowledge, and behavior changes toward EH.

methodsThis was a pilot before-and-after study. Four modules were available in the 6-hour e-learning course: introduction to EH, population-based approach (mapping tools and resources), clinical cases, and communication tools. From August to September 2021, we recruited first-year GP residents from the University of Montpellier (N=130). Participants' satisfaction, knowledge improvements for 19 EH risks, procedure to report EH risks to health authorities online, and behavior change (to consider the possible effects of the environment on their own and their patients' health) were assessed using self-reported questionnaires on a Likert scale (1-5). Paired Student t tests and the McNemar χ

resultsA total of 74 GP residents completed the e-learning and answered the pre- and posttest questionnaires. The mean satisfaction score was 4.0 (SD 0.9) out of 5. Knowledge scores of EH risks increased significantly after the e-learning course, with a mean difference of 30% (P<.001) for all items. Behavioral scores improved significantly by 18% for the participant's health and by 26% for patients' health (P<.001). These improvements did not vary significantly according to participant characteristics (eg, sex, children, place of work).

conclusionsThe e-learning course improved knowledge and behavior related to EH. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the PCEH course on clinical practice and potential benefits for patients. This course was designed to serve as a knowledge base that could be reused each year with a view toward sustainability. This course will integrate new modules and will be adapted to the evolution of EH status indicators and target population needs.

Indexed as

awarenessbehavioralbehavior changecourseeducationale-learningeLearningenvironmentenvironmentalenvironmental healthgeneral practicegeneral practitionerGPlearningmedical educationOne Healthonline learningprimary carequestionnaireremotesatisfactionsurveyteaching

Identifiers

PMID38722679
PMCPMC11117128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.