Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722675›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Serbian Version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation Study Among Primary Health Care Users.

Branko Vujkovic, Voin Brkovic, Ana Pajičić, Vedrana Pavlovic, Dejana Stanisavljevic, Dušanka Krajnović, Aleksandra Jovic Vranes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Branko Vujkovic *Institute of Public Health of Sabac, Sabac, .ORCID 0000-0001-8472-5567
Voin Brkovic *Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0001-5077-2779
Ana Pajičić *Institute of Public Health of Sabac, Sabac, .ORCID 0009-0009-5824-7376
Vedrana Pavlovic *Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0001-8367-9511
Dejana Stanisavljevic *Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0001-8899-2929
Dušanka Krajnović *Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0003-1699-7944
Aleksandra Jovic Vranes *Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, .ORCID 0000-0002-9023-4024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs digital health services are increasingly developing and becoming more interactive in Serbia, a comprehensive instrument for measuring eHealth literacy (EHL) is needed.

objectiveThis study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and investigate the psychometric properties of the Serbian version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ); to evaluate EHL in the population of primary health care (PHC) users in Serbia; and to explore factors associated with their EHL.

methodsThe validation study was conducted in 8 PHC centers in the territory of the Mačva district in Western Serbia. A stratified sampling method was used to obtain a representative sample. The Translation Integrity Procedure was followed to adapt the questionnaire to the Serbian language. The psychometric properties of the Serbian version of the eHLQ were analyzed through the examination of factorial structure, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine participant characteristics. Differences between groups were tested by the 2-tailed Students t test and ANOVA. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to determine factors related to EHL.

resultsA total of 475 PHC users were enrolled. The mean age was 51.0 (SD 17.3; range 19-94) years, and most participants were female (328/475, 69.1%). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the 7-factor structure of the questionnaire. Values for incremental fit index (0.96) and comparative fit index (0.95) were above the cutoff of ≥0.95. The root mean square error of approximation value of 0.05 was below the suggested value of ≤0.06. Cronbach α of the entire scale was 0.95, indicating excellent scale reliability, with Cronbach α ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 for domains. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.63 to 0.82, indicating moderate to good test-retest reliability. The highest EHL mean scores were obtained for the understanding of health concepts and language (mean 2.86, SD 0.32) and feel safe and in control (mean 2.89, SD 0.33) domains. Statistically significant differences (all P<.05) for all 7 eHLQ scores were observed for age, education, perceived material status, perceived health status, searching for health information on the internet, and occupation (except domain 4). In multivariable regression models, searching for health information on the internet and being aged younger than 65 years were associated with higher values of all domain scores except the domain feel safe and in control for variable age.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the Serbian version of the eHLQ can be a useful tool in the measurement of EHL and in the planning of digital health interventions at the population and individual level due to its strong psychometric properties in the Serbian context.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTelemedicineAdultAgedFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSerbiaSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsYoung Adultcommunicationdigital healthdigital health literacyeHealtheHealth Literacy QuestionnaireeHLQprimary healthcarequestionnaireSerbiatechnology

Identifiers

PMID38722675
PMCPMC11117135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.