Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722571›Full record

ReviewNeurology and therapy2024

Network Meta-analysis of Ravulizumab and Alternative Interventions for the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Stacey L Clardy, Sean J Pittock, Orhan Aktas, Jin Nakahara, Noriko Isobe, Diego Centonze, Sami Fam, Adrian Kielhorn, Jeffrey C Yu, Jeroen Jansen and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07010302 (A Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Trial of Rituximab Versus Ravulizumab, Inebilizumab, Satralizumab and Eculizumab To Prevent Relapses in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07010302 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Trial of Rituximab Versus Ravulizumab, Inebilizumab, Satralizumab and Eculizumab To Prevent Relapses in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2026 to 2030Enrolled540ConditionsNMOSDArmsRituximab (R), Eculizumab (Soliris®), Ravulizumab, Satralizumab, Inebilizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stacey L ClardyDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah, 175 Medical Drive North, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Stacey.Clardy@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-9428
Sean J PittockMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Orhan AktasHeinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jin NakaharaKeio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko IsobeKyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Diego CentonzeTor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Sami FamAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA, USA.
Adrian KielhornAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey C YuAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeroen JansenPRECISIONheor, Oakland, CA, USA.
Ina ZhangPRECISIONheor, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions.

methodsEfficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs).

resultsFor patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions.

conclusionIn the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.

Indexed as

Aquaporin-4EculizumabInebilizumabNetwork meta-analysisNeuromyelitis opticaRavulizumabSatralizumab

Identifiers

PMID38722571
PMCPMC11136926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.