Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722535›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

The Physical Demands of Wheelchair Tennis Match Play: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Samuel Williamson, Clare L Ardern, Cain Berry, Neil Heron, Dina C Janse van Rensburg, Marleen G T Jansen, Samantha McCormick, Machar Reid, Alejandro Sánchez-Pay, Tobias Saueressig and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Samuel WilliamsonInternational Tennis Federation, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3533-0603
Clare L ArdernDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8102-3631
Cain BerryInternational Tennis Federation, London, UK.
Neil HeronCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4123-9806
Dina C Janse van RensburgSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-6992
Marleen G T JansenSport Science Department, Royal Dutch Lawn Tennis Association (KNLTB), Amstelveen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-7748
Samantha McCormickSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Machar ReidTennis Australia, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7196-3731
Alejandro Sánchez-PayFaculty of Sport Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1600-4172
Tobias SaueressigPhysio Meets Science GmbH, Leimen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3332-3856
Linda J SchoonmadeUniversity Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2407-5977
Robert B ShawSpinal Cord Injury British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Rienk M A van der SlikkeHuman Kinetic Technology, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-3519
Nick WebbornIPC Medical Committee, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-5557
Babette M PluimSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. b.pluim@knltb.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-8980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheelchair tennis, a globally popular sport, features a professional tour spanning 40 countries and over 160 tournaments. Despite its widespread appeal, information about the physical demands of wheelchair tennis is scattered across various studies, necessitating a comprehensive systematic review to synthesise available data.

objectiveThe aim was to provide a detailed synthesis of the physical demands associated with wheelchair tennis, encompassing diverse factors such as court surfaces, performance levels, sport classes, and sexes.

methodsWe conducted comprehensive searches in the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases, covering articles from inception to March 1, 2023. Forward and backward citation tracking from the included articles was carried out using Scopus, and we established eligibility criteria following the Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design (PECOS) framework. Our study focused on wheelchair tennis players participating at regional, national, or international levels, including both juniors and adults, and open and quad players. We analysed singles and doubles matches and considered sex (male, female), sport class (open, quad), and court surface type (hard, clay, grass) as key comparative points. The outcomes of interest encompassed play duration, on-court movement, stroke performance, and physiological match variables. The selected study designs included observational cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies (baseline data only). We calculated pooled means or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and employed a random-effects meta-analysis with robust variance estimation. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane Q and 95% prediction intervals.

resultsOur literature search retrieved 643 records, with 24 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Most available information focused on international male wheelchair tennis players in the open division, primarily competing in singles on hard courts. Key findings (mean [95% CI]) for these players on hard courts were match duration 65.9 min [55.0-78.8], set duration 35.0 min [28.2-43.5], game duration 4.6 min [0.92-23.3], rally duration 6.1 s [3.7-10.2], effective playing time 19.8% [18.9-20.7], and work-to-rest ratio 1:4.1 [1:3.7-1:4.4]. Insufficient data were available to analyse play duration for female players. However, for the available data on hard court matches, the average set duration was 34.8 min [32.5-37.2]. International male players on hard court covered an average distance per match of 3859 m [1917-7768], with mean and peak average forward speeds of 1.06 m/s [0.85-1.32] and 3.55 m/s [2.92-4.31], respectively. These players executed an average of 365.9 [317.2-422.1] strokes per match, 200.6 [134.7-299.0] per set, 25.4 [16.7-38.7] per game, and 3.4 [2.6-4.6] per rally. Insufficient data were available for a meta-analysis of female players' on-court movement and stroke performance. The average and peak heart rates of international male players on hard court were 134.3 [124.2-145.1] and 166.0 [132.7-207.6] beats per minute, and the average match heart rate expressed as a percentage of peak heart rate was 74.7% [46.4-100]. We found no studies concerning regional players or juniors, and only one study on doubles match play.

conclusionsWhile we present a comprehensive overview of the physical demands of wheelchair tennis, our understanding predominantly centres around international male players competing on hard courts in the open division. To attain a more comprehensive insight into the sport's physical requirements, future research should prioritise the inclusion of data on female and quad players, juniors, doubles, and matches played on clay and grass court surfaces. Such endeavours will facilitate the development of more tailored and effective training programmes for wheelchair tennis players and coaches. The protocol for this systematic review was registered a priori at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (Registration https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.3.0060 ).

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceTennisWheelchairsCompetitive BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleSex Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.