Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722502›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting mortality in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective analysis.

Haosheng Wang, Yehong Liu, Jun Yuan, Yuhai Wang, Ying Yuan, Yuanyuan Liu, Xu Ren, Jinxu Zhou

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haosheng Wang *Wuxi Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214000, China.
Yehong Liu *Department of Cardiology, The 904th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214000, China.
Jun YuanWuxi Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214000, China.
Yuhai WangWuxi Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214000, China.
Ying YuanInstitute of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230022, China.
Yuanyuan LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Lu' an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, Anhui Province, 237000, China.
Xu RenWuxi Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214000, China.
Jinxu ZhouWuxi Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, 214000, China. zjinxu1979@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3190-8221

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Networked Collective Intelligence, Southeast University M2021090the major topics of the Wuxi Health Committee Z202206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence links the prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) to various factors, including baseline clinical characteristics, TBI specifics, and neuroimaging outcomes. This study focuses on identifying risk factors for short-term survival in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) cases and developing a prognostic model.

methodsAnalyzing 430 acute sTBI patients from January 2018 to December 2023 at the 904th Hospital's Neurosurgery Department, this retrospective case-control study separated patients into survival outcomes: 288 deceased and 142 survivors. It evaluated baseline, clinical, hematological, and radiological data to identify risk and protective factors through univariate and Lasso regression. A multivariate model was then formulated to pinpoint independent prognostic factors, assessing their relationships via Spearman's correlation. The model's accuracy was gauged using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, with additional statistical analyses for quantitative factors and model effectiveness. Internal validation employed ROC, calibration curves, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and Clinical Impact Curves (CIC) to assess model discrimination, utility, and accuracy. The International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) and Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head injury (CRASH) models were also compared through multivariate regression.

resultsFactors like unilateral and bilateral pupillary non-reactivity at admission, the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR), infratentorial hematoma, and Helsinki CT score were identified as independent risk factors (OR > 1), whereas serum albumin emerged as a protective factor (OR < 1). The model showed superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.955 and surpassed both IMPACT and CRASH models in predictive accuracy. Internal validation confirmed the model's high discriminative capability, clinical relevance, and effectiveness.

conclusionsShort-term survival in sTBI is significantly influenced by factors such as pupillary response, dNLR, PLR, DFR, serum albumin levels, infratentorial hematoma occurrence, and Helsinki CT scores at admission. The developed nomogram accurately predicts sTBI outcomes, offering significant clinical utility.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticNomogramsAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsD-dimer to fibrinogen ratioHematological indicatorsNeuroimaging indicatorsNomogram prognostic modelPlatelet to lymphocyte ratioSevere traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.