Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722477›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2024

Comparative Responses of Two Major Cucurbit Pests, Zeugodacus cucurbitae and Zeugodacus tau to Phenylbutanoid Male Lures.

Rabiatul Addawiyah Shamshir, Suk-Ling Wee

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Selection ofInsects · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rabiatul Addawiyah ShamshirDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, 43600 UKM, Malaysia.
Suk-Ling WeeDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, 43600 UKM, Malaysia. slwee@ukm.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0749-3093

Funding

International Atomic Energy Agency ST-2019-005 (Research Contract: 23170)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zeugodacus cucurbitae and Z. tau are two major fruit fly pests of cucurbitaceous plants in the tropical and subtropical regions. The former species has a broader host range and wider world distribution than the latter. With global climate change, Z. tau shows great potential for geographical expansion with several invasion records in recent years. Males of both species are attracted to cue lure (CL) (and raspberry ketone (RK), a deacetyl derivative of CL), a common male lure used in fruit fly population detection, monitoring and control programs. Males of both species are also known to respond to zingerone (ZN), which are produced by some rainforest orchids. Previous studies have shown that fruit fly-male lure interactions are unique to species and lure types, and significantly impact the success of a lure-based fruit fly control program. We seek to compare the attraction of Z. cucurbitae and Z. tau males to CL, RK and ZN via Probit behavioral assays. Our results showed that CL is more attractive to Z. cucurbitae and Z. tau males than RK, while ZN is a poor lure for both species. Attraction Z. tau to CL is slightly lower than Z. cucurbitae, but the former is at least 1.71 times less attractive to RK than the latter. Together with published information on species' sexual development, our current study indicates a lure-based control program via male annihilation technique for Z. tau will be more challenging than Z. cucurbitae and should incorporate other integrated pest management strategies for a desirable outcome.

Indexed as

ButanonesTephritidaeAnimalsGuaiacolMalePheromonesButanonesGuaiacolPheromonesraspberry ketonezingeroneCue lureMelon fruit flyProbit bioassayPumpkin fruit flyRaspberry ketoneZingerone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.