ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Evaluation of lesion contrast in the walk-through long axial FOV PET scanner simulated with XCAT anthropomorphic phantoms.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Instrumentation Digital Twins in PET and SPECT Imaging: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Total Body PET/CT: Future Aspects.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the lesion contrast in a cost-effective long axial field of view (FOV) PET scanner, called the walk-through PET (WT-PET). The scanner consists of two flat detector panels covering the entire torso and head, scanning patients in an upright position for increased throughput. High-resolution, depth-of-interaction capable, monolithic detector technology is used to provide good spatial resolution and enable detection of smaller lesions.
methodsMonte Carlo GATE simulations are used in conjunction with XCAT anthropomorphic phantoms to evaluate lesion contrast in lung, liver and breast for various lesion diameters (10, 7 and 5 mm), activity concentration ratios (8:1, 4:1 and 2:1) and patient BMIs (18-37). Images were reconstructed iteratively with listmode maximum likelihood expectation maximization, and contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) were obtained for the reconstructed lesions.
resultsResults shows notable variations in contrast recovery coefficients (CRC) across different lesion sizes and organ locations within the XCAT phantoms. Specifically, our findings reveal that 10 mm lesions consistently exhibit higher CRC compared to 7 mm and 5 mm lesions, with increases of approximately 54% and 330%, respectively, across all investigated organs. Moreover, high contrast recovery is observed in most liver lesions regardless of diameter or activity ratio (average CRC = 42%), as well as in the 10 mm lesions in the lung. Notably, for the 10 mm lesions, the liver demonstrates 42% and 62% higher CRC compared to the lung and breast, respectively. This trend remains consistent across lesion sizes, with the liver consistently exhibiting higher CRC values compared to the lung and breast: 7 mm lesions show an increase of 96% and 41%, while 5 mm lesions exhibit approximately 294% and 302% higher CRC compared to the lung and breast, respectively.
conclusionA comparison with a conventional pixelated LSO long axial FOV PET shows similar performance, achieved at a reduced cost for the WT-PET due to a reduction in required number of detectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.