ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2024
Epoxy resin bioactive dental implant capped with hydroxyapatite and curcumin nanoparticles: a novel approach.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of sustainable bamboo-derived cellulose nanocrystals on the mechanical performance and antibacterial potential of dental resin composites.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Development of Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Implant Biomaterial for Triggering Osteogenesis.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Non-Bone-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoporosis: Evidence Mapping and Nanomedicine Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Nanogel-Based Precision Bone Regeneration: Rational Design, Biological Barrier Penetration, and Osteoporotic Microenvironment Remodeling.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Anion-Dependent Layered Double Hydroxide-Reinforced Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels for Osteoimmunomodulation and Bone Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced surface properties and wettability of zirconia-hydroxyapatite-poly(acrylic acid) nanocomposites for dental applications.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, the developed bioactive dental implant (BDI) from epoxy resin (ER), hydroxyapatite (HA), and curcumin nanoparticles (CUNPs). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe prepared BDI were characterized using their physicochemical, mechanical, antimicrobial, bioactive, and biocompatibility study. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) morphology of the BDI was observed HA mineralized crystal layer after being immersed in the stimulated body fluids (SBF) solution.
resultsThe mechanical properties of the BDI exhibited tensile strength (250.61 ± 0.43 MPa), elongation at break (215.66 ± 0.87%), flexural modulus (03.90 ± 0.12 GPa), water absorption (05.68 ± 0.15%), and water desorption (06.42 ± 0.14%). The antimicrobial activity of BDI was observed in excellent zone of inhibition against the gram-negative (15.33 ± 0.04%) and gram- positive (15.98 ± 0.07%) bacteria. The biocompatibility study of BDI on osteoblasts cell line (MG-63) was analyzed using MTT (3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay. The results were observed 85% viable cells present in the BDI compared to the control (only ER) samples.
conclusionsBased on the research outcome, the BDI could be used for biomaterials application, particularly tooth dental implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38722427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.