Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722376›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2024

The relationship between stone-free and patient position in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a randomized prospective study.

Cengiz Çanakcı, Erdinç Dinçer, Utku Can, Alper Coşkun, Bilal Kaan Otbasan, Orkunt Özkaptan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06809582 (Does the Positioning in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Affect Stone-Free Rates? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06809582 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Does the Positioning in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Affect Stone-Free Rates? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOndokuz Mayıs UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled128ConditionsStone, Kidney, Stones, Kidney, Stone, RenalArmsThe T-Tilt position
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cengiz ÇanakcıDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey. cengizcanakci@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2654-1986
Erdinç DinçerDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0644-8282
Utku CanDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9953-3522
Alper CoşkunDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4745-5160
Bilal Kaan OtbasanDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2583-6838
Orkunt ÖzkaptanDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-1319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResidual fragments not removed with urinary stone surgery may become symptomatic. In this context, this study was carried out to investigate the effect of performing retrograde intrarenal surgery, which is conventionally performed in the lithotomy position, in the modified lithotomy position (Trend-side) on stone-free rates following the surgery.

methodsThis prospective study consisted of 100 patients with a single kidney stone smaller than 2 cm between 2021 and 2023. These patients were randomized into two groups of 50 patients each to be operated on in the conventional lithotomy and Trend-side positions. Variables were compared using independent t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the lithotomy and Trend-side position groups in terms of preoperative size, density, location of the stone, and hydronephrosis degree. Stone-free rate was 72% (n = 36) in the lithotomy group and 92% (n = 46) in the Trend-side group. Hence, there was a significant difference between the groups in the stone-free rate in favor of the Trend-side group (p = 0.009). Fragmentation time was statistically significantly shorter in the Trend-side group than in the lithotomy group (34 ± 17 min vs. 43 ± 14 min; p = 0.006). There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative complication rates.

conclusionPerforming retrograde intrarenal surgery in the Trend-side position shortened the duration of fragmentation compared to the lithotomy position and was associated with higher stone-free rates. In conclusion, the Trend-side position can be safely preferred in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery due to kidney stones.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiPatient PositioningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical ProceduresKidney stonePatient positionRetrograde intrarenal surgeryStone-free

Identifiers

PMID38722376
PMCPMC11081972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.