Trial reportWorld journal of urology2024
The relationship between stone-free and patient position in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a randomized prospective study.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06809582 (Does the Positioning in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Affect Stone-Free Rates? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does the Positioning in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Affect Stone-Free Rates? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intraoperative positioning strategies to improve stone-free outcomes during retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of T-tilt, Trendelenburg, and dorsal lithotomy positions in retrograde intrarenal surgery: surgical, inflammatory, and efficiency outcomes.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Kidney stabilization in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact on surgical efficiency and stone-free rates.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Clinical efficacy of the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position vs. the lithotomy position in FANS-UAS-assisted IPC-RIRS for renal calculi.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advanced Management of Complex Transplant Lithiasis: Low Lithotomy and Boot Stirrups Technique.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- A comment to "The relationship between stone-free and patient position in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a randomized prospective study".World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor about "The relationship between stone-free and patient position in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a randomized prospective study".World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeResidual fragments not removed with urinary stone surgery may become symptomatic. In this context, this study was carried out to investigate the effect of performing retrograde intrarenal surgery, which is conventionally performed in the lithotomy position, in the modified lithotomy position (Trend-side) on stone-free rates following the surgery.
methodsThis prospective study consisted of 100 patients with a single kidney stone smaller than 2 cm between 2021 and 2023. These patients were randomized into two groups of 50 patients each to be operated on in the conventional lithotomy and Trend-side positions. Variables were compared using independent t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the lithotomy and Trend-side position groups in terms of preoperative size, density, location of the stone, and hydronephrosis degree. Stone-free rate was 72% (n = 36) in the lithotomy group and 92% (n = 46) in the Trend-side group. Hence, there was a significant difference between the groups in the stone-free rate in favor of the Trend-side group (p = 0.009). Fragmentation time was statistically significantly shorter in the Trend-side group than in the lithotomy group (34 ± 17 min vs. 43 ± 14 min; p = 0.006). There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative complication rates.
conclusionPerforming retrograde intrarenal surgery in the Trend-side position shortened the duration of fragmentation compared to the lithotomy position and was associated with higher stone-free rates. In conclusion, the Trend-side position can be safely preferred in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery due to kidney stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.