Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38722320›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Real-world insights and outcomes related to ciclosporin A 0.1% cationic emulsion for the long-term treatment of dry eye disease in Germany: Country-level sub-analysis of the PERSPECTIVE study.

Ines Lanzl, Christoph M E Deuter, Katrin Lorenz, Gerd Geerling, PERSPECTIVE German study group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ines LanzlChiemsee Augen Tagesklinik, Geigelsteinstrasse 26, 83209, Prien, Germany. info@auge.bayern.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-8976
Christoph M E DeuterCentre for Ophthalmology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Katrin LorenzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1755-7396
Gerd GeerlingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2034-3687
PERSPECTIVE German study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe PERSPECTIVE study was a real-world European, non-interventional, multicenter, observational study that evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of ciclosporin A (CsA) 0.1% cationic emulsion (CE) in routine clinical practice as a treatment for adults with severe keratitis and dry eye disease (DED) that remained insufficiently controlled with artificial tears. This sub-analysis examined data from ophthalmology clinics in Germany to provide more precise insights into treatment patterns, outcomes, and clinical decision-making related to CsA 0.1% CE.

methodsStudy data were collected from adults starting CsA 0.1% CE (one drop in both eyes at bedtime) and followed up at Week 4, 12, and 24, and Month 12. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score (Oxford Grade Scale) at Month 12. Secondary endpoints examined the severity of ocular signs and symptoms, and adverse events (AEs).

resultsA total of 236 patients from 20 ophthalmology clinics in Germany participated in the PERSPECTIVE study (69.9% female; mean age 60.8 years). Following treatment with CsA 0.1% CE, patients experienced significant reductions in CFS score from Week 4, which were maintained through to Month 12 (P < 0.0001). From baseline, 81.6% of patients experienced an improvement in CFS score at Month 12. CsA 0.1% CE provided significant reductions in the severity of eyelid and conjunctival erythema at Month 12 compared with baseline (P < 0.001), as well as significant reductions in the severity of subjective ocular symptoms (all P ≤ 0.015). Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of CsA 0.1% CE. Tolerability was rated as "satisfactory," "good," or "very good" by 97.2% of physicians and 95.7% of patients.

conclusionOutcomes in Germany were similar to those reported for the overall European study population and are indicative of the treatment results that ophthalmologists may expect to see with CsA 0.1% CE treatment in real-life clinical practice. Treatment with CsA 0.1% CE provided long-term improvements over 12 months and was generally well tolerated.

Indexed as

CyclosporineDry Eye SyndromesEmulsionsImmunosuppressive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsCyclosporineEmulsionsImmunosuppressive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsCiclosporin A 0.1% cationic emulsionDry eye diseaseGermanyPERSPECTIVE studyReal-world evidenceSevere keratitis

Identifiers

PMID38722320
PMCPMC11458673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.